Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc.
| Docket Number | SC94462 |
| Decision Date | 22 September 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
72 cases
-
Menschik v. Heartland Reg'l Med. Ctr.
...145 and 146.3 We review the decision of a trial court to admit or exclude evidence for an abuse of discretion. Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., 473 S.W.3d 107, 114 (Mo. banc 2015). "An evidentiary ruling is an abuse of discretion only if it is ‘clearly against the logic of the......
-
Ferguson v. Curators of Lincoln Univ.
...than on direct evidence ... because employers are shrewd enough not to leave a trail of direct evidence.’ ” Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., 473 S.W.3d 107, 116 (Mo. banc 2015) (quoting Daugherty v. City of Maryland Heights, 231 S.W.3d 814, 818, 818 n. 4 (Mo. banc 2007) ). “Th......
-
Lewellen v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.
...arbitrary that it shocks the sense of justice and indicates a lack of careful, deliberate consideration.’ " Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc. , 473 S.W.3d 107, 114 (Mo. banc 2015) (quoting Lozano v. BNSF Ry. Co. , 421 S.W.3d 448, 451 (Mo. banc 2014) ). Rules 61.01(d) and (f) gra......
-
Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr.
...elements.5 Mignone was "the master of ... her lawsuit and [could] choose which causes of action to plead." Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc. , 473 S.W.3d 107, 118 (Mo. banc 2015). As explained in § I.A., above, the discrete acts alleged in Instruction Nos. 12 and No. 13 were ind......
Get Started for Free
15 books & journal articles
-
Hearsay rule
...201 F.3d 815 (C.A.6, Ky., 2000), and In re Brittany L., 737 A.2d 670 (N.H., 1999). 45 Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc. , 473 S.W.3d 107, 128 Fair Employment Practice Cases, BNA, 155 (2015). An admission of an agent or employee may be received in evidence against his principal, ......
-
Hearsay Rule
...201 F.3d 815 (C.A.6, Ky., 2000), and In re Brittany L., 737 A.2d 670 (N.H., 1999). 45 Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., 473 S.W.3d 107, 128 Fair Employment Practice Cases, BNA, 155 (2015). An admission of an agent or employee may be received in evidence against his principal, i......
-
Hearsay Rule
...or not the employee was authorized to act for the employer regarding the matter admitted. Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc. , 473 S.W.3d 107, 128 Fair Employment Practice Cases, BNA, 155 (2015). An admission of an agent or employee may be received in evidence against his princip......
-
Hearsay Rule
...201 F.3d 815 (C.A.6, Ky., 2000), and In re Brittany L., 737 A.2d 670 (N.H., 1999). 42.1 Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc ., 473 S.W.3d 107, 128 Fair Employment Practice Cases, BNA, 155 (2015). An admission of an agent or employee may be received in evidence against his principal......
Get Started for Free