Cox v. Spangler, No. 67907-0.
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Washington |
| Writing for the Court | ALEXANDER, Chief Justice. |
| Citation | 22 P.3d 791 |
| Parties | Deborah E. COX, et al., Respondents, v. Lynn M. SPANGLER, et al., Petitioners |
| Decision Date | 08 May 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 67907-0. |
22 P.3d 791
Deborah E. COX, et al., Respondents,v.
Lynn M. SPANGLER, et al., Petitioners
No. 67907-0.
Supreme Court of Washington.
May 8, 2001.
ORDER CHANGING OPINION
ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.
It is hereby ordered that the opinion in the above cause, as the same appears at 141 Wash.2d 431, 5 P.3d 1265, be changed as follows:
In the seventh line from the top of page 445, [5 P.3d page 1272] the word "divisible" is deleted and the word "indivisible" is inserted in its place.
To continue reading
Request your trial
63 practice notes
-
Gosney v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., No. 74717-7-I
...statement of the applicable law is reversible error where it prejudices a party." Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). Error is not prejudicial "unless it affects, or presumptively affects, the outcome of the trial." Brown v. Spokane County Fire Prot. Dist......
-
Thompson v. King Feed & Nutrition Service, Inc., No. 74280-4.
...statement of the applicable law is reversible error where it prejudices a party. Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). Jury instructions are sufficient when they allow counsel to argue their theories of the case, do not mislead the jury, and when taken as a......
-
Wright v. Dave Johnson Ins. Inc., No. 40531–8–II.
...view no reasonable person would take, or applies the wrong legal standard to an issue. Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 439, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). ¶ 33 In Schrom v. Bd. For Volunteer Fire Fighters, 153 Wash.2d 19, 36, 100 P.3d 814 (2004), our Supreme Court held that RCW 19.52.01......
-
Gregoire v. City of Oak Harbor, No. 81253-5.
...an erroneous statement of the law is reversible error where it prejudices a party. Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). Jury instructions are sufficient if "they allow the parties to argue their theories of the case, do not mislead the jury and, when taken......
Request a trial to view additional results
63 cases
-
Gosney v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., No. 74717-7-I
...statement of the applicable law is reversible error where it prejudices a party." Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). Error is not prejudicial "unless it affects, or presumptively affects, the outcome of the trial." Brown v. Spokane County Fire Prot. Dist......
-
Thompson v. King Feed & Nutrition Service, Inc., No. 74280-4.
...statement of the applicable law is reversible error where it prejudices a party. Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). Jury instructions are sufficient when they allow counsel to argue their theories of the case, do not mislead the jury, and when taken as a......
-
Wright v. Dave Johnson Ins. Inc., No. 40531–8–II.
...view no reasonable person would take, or applies the wrong legal standard to an issue. Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 439, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). ¶ 33 In Schrom v. Bd. For Volunteer Fire Fighters, 153 Wash.2d 19, 36, 100 P.3d 814 (2004), our Supreme Court held that RCW 19.52.01......
-
Gregoire v. City of Oak Harbor, No. 81253-5.
...an erroneous statement of the law is reversible error where it prejudices a party. Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). Jury instructions are sufficient if "they allow the parties to argue their theories of the case, do not mislead the jury and, when taken......
Request a trial to view additional results