Cox v. Spangler, 67907-0.
Citation | 22 P.3d 791 |
Decision Date | 08 May 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 67907-0.,67907-0. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Washington |
Parties | Deborah E. COX, et al., Respondents, v. Lynn M. SPANGLER, et al., Petitioners |
ORDER CHANGING OPINION
It is hereby ordered that the opinion in the above cause, as the same appears at 141 Wash.2d 431, 5 P.3d 1265, be changed as follows:
In the seventh line from the top of page 445, the word "divisible" is deleted and the word "indivisible" is inserted in its place.
To continue reading
Request your trial66 cases
- Gregoire v. City of Oak Harbor
-
Thompson v. King Feed & Nutrition Service, Inc.
... ... Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000) ... Jury instructions are sufficient when they allow counsel to argue their theories of the ... ...
- King Cnty. v. Vinci Constr. Grands Projets
-
Gosney v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
... ... "[A]n instruction that contains an erroneous statement of the applicable law is reversible error where it prejudices a party." Cox v. Spangler , 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). Error is not prejudicial "unless it affects, or presumptively affects, the outcome of the ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results