Cox v. Spangler, 67907-0.

Citation22 P.3d 791
Decision Date08 May 2001
Docket NumberNo. 67907-0.,67907-0.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Washington
PartiesDeborah E. COX, et al., Respondents, v. Lynn M. SPANGLER, et al., Petitioners

ORDER CHANGING OPINION

ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.

It is hereby ordered that the opinion in the above cause, as the same appears at 141 Wash.2d 431, 5 P.3d 1265, be changed as follows:

In the seventh line from the top of page 445, the word "divisible" is deleted and the word "indivisible" is inserted in its place.

To continue reading

Request your trial
66 cases
  • Gregoire v. City of Oak Harbor
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 2 Diciembre 2010
  • Thompson v. King Feed & Nutrition Service, Inc.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 20 Enero 2005
    ... ... Cox v. Spangler, 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000) ... Jury instructions are sufficient when they allow counsel to argue their theories of the ... ...
  • King Cnty. v. Vinci Constr. Grands Projets
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 9 Noviembre 2015
  • Gosney v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 31 Mayo 2018
    ... ... "[A]n instruction that contains an erroneous statement of the applicable law is reversible error where it prejudices a party." Cox v. Spangler , 141 Wash.2d 431, 442, 5 P.3d 1265, 22 P.3d 791 (2000). Error is not prejudicial "unless it affects, or presumptively affects, the outcome of the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT