Cox v. State, 27372

CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals
Writing for the CourtWOODLEY
CitationCox v. State, 274 S.W.2d 844 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955)
Decision Date02 February 1955
Docket NumberNo. 27372,27372
PartiesWilliam B. COX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Frank W. Steinle, Jourdanton, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of Art. 666-17(1), V.A.P.C., a part of the Texas Liquor Control Act, the complaint and information alleging that appellant had a financial interest in a retail package store permit issued to one Lewis Mahulla and was at the same time the holder of a license authorizing the sale of beer at retail, and was engaged in such business of such sale of beer at the same location. The jury assessed as punishment 30 days in jail and a fine of $200.

There are no formal bills of exception and no informal bills are indexed in the Question and Answer statement of facts.

The statement of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. Palmer, 14503
    • United States
    • Texas Civil Court of Appeals
    • January 18, 1967
    ...Berry v. McAdams, 93 Tex. 431, 55 S.W. 1112 (1900); Eldridge v. Poirer, 50 S.W.2d 888, 889 (Tex.Civ.App., 1955, no writ); Cox v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 274 S.W.2d 844; Marek v. Goyen, 346 S.W.2d 926 (Tex.Civ . App., 1961, no Palmer calls our attention to the following language in Article 5454:......
  • Texas & N. Ry. Co. v. Logwood, 7703
    • United States
    • Texas Civil Court of Appeals
    • February 22, 1966
    ... ... Poirer, Tex.Civ.App., 50 S.W.2d 888, writ refused (1932); Henderson v. Couch, Tex.Civ.App., 274 S.W.2d 844, no writ (1955); Texas State" Bank of Alice v. Baker, Tex.Civ.App., 275 S .W.2d 168, no writ (1955); Marek v. Goyen, Tex.Civ.App., 346 S.W.2d 926, no writ (1961) ...       \xC2" ... ...