Craig v. Provo City

Docket Number20150531
Decision Date26 August 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • August 31, 2017
    ...at 47 n.22, 109 S.Ct. 1597. And this is not merely "another way of saying that the legislature could have spoken more clearly." Craig v. Provo City , 2016 UT 40, ¶ 38, 389 P.3d 423. Rather, the explicit use of state or tribal law for "extended family member" and "Indian custodian" but not f......
  • Count My Vote, Inc. v. Cox
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • October 10, 2019
    ...(citation omitted)), or an assertion of a general statutory "purpose" that purportedly overrides the text, see Craig v. Provo City , 2016 UT 40, ¶ 33, 389 P.3d 423 ("text must control over a general sense of legislative purpose"). ¶20 The conclusion that CMV’s view is incompatible with the ......
  • GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • September 12, 2018
    ...issue, both as to immunity as an affirmative defense generally, and as to equitable remedies such as estoppel. See Craig v. Provo City , 2016 UT 40, ¶¶ 22–23, 389 P.3d 423 ; see also UTAH CODE § 63G-7-401(7) (prohibiting a governmental entity from challenging the validity of a notice under ......
  • State v. Rushton
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • April 7, 2017
    ...failure to speak more clearly’ yields no basis for interpreting the ambiguous terms it voted into law." Id. ; see also Craig v. Provo City, 2016 UT 40, ¶ 38, 389 P.3d 423 ("It is usually quite beside the point that the legislature ‘knows how’ to speak more explicitly. That is another way of......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Hidden Bias in Empirical Textualism
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 109-4, April 2021
    • April 1, 2021
    ...P.3d 663, 691 (describing corpus linguistics’ tendency to focus on semantics and pragmatics); Craig v. Provo City, 2016 UT 40, ¶ 26 n.3, 389 P.3d 423, 428 n.3 (commending Provo City for brief‌ing on corpus linguistics); State v. J.M. S., 2011 UT 75, ¶¶ 38–40, 280 P.3d 410, 418–19 (Lee, J., ......