Craigo v. State ex rel. Van Natta, 3--1173A150
Decision Date | 04 February 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 3--1173A150,3--1173A150 |
Parties | Arthur Ray CRAIGO, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, on the relation of Ralph W. VAN NATTA, Commissioner of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, Plaintiff-Appellee. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Jerry N. Virgil, Elkhart, for defendant-appellant.
Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Robert E. Dwyer, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for plaintiff-appellee.
This is an appeal by defendant-appellant Arthur Ray Craigo from a judgment of the trial court ordering the suspension of his driver's license.
On March 23, 1973, an affidavit was filed against appellant wherein it was alleged that he is an habitual traffic offender. Attached to the affidavit was a certified copy of appellant's driving record. Following a hearing on June 15, 1973, the trial court found appellant to be an habitual traffic offender and ordered that his driving privileges be suspended for a period of ten years. Thereafter, appellant's motion to correct errors was overruled and the present appeal was perfected.
The sole issue which will be considered is whether the trial court's finding that appellant is an habitual traffic offender is supported by sufficient evidence.
The only evidence presented at the hearing was the affidavit initiating this proceeding and a copy of Craigo's driving record certified by the Commissioner of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. This record indicates numerous convictions of motor vehicle violations, the most recent conviction occurring on January 12, 1973. This record, however, does not indicate on what date the offenses resulting in these convictions were committed.
IC 1971, 9--4--13--3 (Burns Code Ed.), provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
The requirement that at least one of the offenses be committed 'on or after the effective date * * * of this chapter' is necessary to avoid the constitutional proscription of ex post facto laws. State ex rel. Van Natta v. Rising (1974), Ind., 310 N.E.2d 873. See: Art. 1, § 10 of the Constitution of the United States; Art. 1, § 24 of the Constitution of the State of Indiana. It should be pointed out that it is not the occurrence of a conviction on or after the effective date of the chapter which renders its penalties constitutionally capable of imposition;...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kuhn v. State ex rel. Van Natta
...convictions upon which the habitual traffic offender judgment will be based are needed. As stated in Craigo v. State ex rel. Van Natta (1975), 163 Ind.App. 158, 160, 322 N.E.2d 400, 402: "The defendant is entitled to be informed of where, when and in what court such convictions This statute......
- Hardin v. State ex rel. Van Natta, 1-1177A268
-
Hardin v. State
...passed.' Davis v. State, (1898) 152 Ind. 34, 51 N.E. 928; McTate v. State, (1971) 256 Ind. 55, 267 N.E.2d 76; Craigo v. State ex rel. VanNatta, (1975) Ind.App., 322 N.E.2d 400. Upon the basis of this clear error appearing on the record, we remand to the trial court with instructions to rese......
-
Sallee v. State ex rel. Bureau of Motor Vehicles
...driving record and "all relevant abstracts of conviction" (emphasis ours) to the prosecuting attorney. See Craigo v. State Ex Rel. Van Natta (1975), 163 Ind.App. 158, 322 N.E.2d 400. IC 1971, 9-4-13-7 (Burns Code Ed.) states "The documents certified by the commissioner shall be admissible a......