Craigslist, Inc. v. NATUREMARKET, INC.
Decision Date | 05 March 2010 |
Docket Number | No. C 08-5065 PJH.,C 08-5065 PJH. |
Parties | CRAIGSLIST, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATUREMARKET, INC., et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California |
Brian Patrick Hennessy, Perkins Coie LLP, Menlo Park, CA, Elizabeth L. McDougall, Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN PART AND DENYING IT IN PART
The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge James' report and recommendation re plaintiff craigslist, Inc.'s motion for default judgment. Defendants Naturemarket, Inc. d/b/a powerpostings.com and Igor Gasov filed no objections to the report. The court finds the report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, the court GRANTS plaintiff's motion for default judgment as to all claims asserted in plaintiff's first amended complaint; GRANTS the request for a permanent injunction; GRANTS the request for attorney's fees and costs; and DENIES the request for punitive damages.
The court awards plaintiff $470,000.00 in statutory damages under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and $840,000.00 in liquidated damages under the Terms of Use Agreement(s), but DENIES Craigslist's request for punitive damages.
The court GRANTS plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees in the amount of $65,038.20, and costs in the amount of $1,712.07.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff craigslist's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Igor Gasov and Naturemarket, Inc. d/b/a powerpostings.com. (Dkt. # 43.) To date, Defendants have not filed an opposition or otherwise appeared in this matter. On July 2, 2009, the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton, the presiding judge in this matter, referred the pending Motion to the undersigned to prepare a Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. # 47.) After thoroughly reviewing Plaintiffs briefs, pleadings, and the controlling legal authorities, the undersigned REOMMENDS that the District Court GRANT Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants as set forth below.
Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint against Defendant Naturemarket, Inc. d/b/a powerpostings.com. (Dkt. # 1.) On March 31, 2009, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint adding Defendant Igor Gasov as a named defendant. (Dkt. # 23.) The following facts are taken from Plaintiff's Complaint and First Amended Complaint.
Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in San Francisco, California. (Compl. ¶ 19; FAC ¶ 19.) Plaintiff owns and operates the website www.craigslist.org, which is an internet-based local classified ad service. (Compl. ¶ 2; FAC ¶ 2.) Plaintiff has registered copyrights in the website, including the website's account creation and ad posting pages. (Compl. ¶¶ 62-69; FAC ¶¶ 63-70.) Plaintiff has also registered the "craigslist" mark. (Compl. ¶¶ 70-77; FAC ¶¶ 71-78.)
Access to and use of Plaintiffs website and services are governed by its Terms of Use Agreement ("TOUs"). (Compl. ¶¶ 10, 11, 32-36; FAC ¶¶ 10, 11, 33-37.) The TOUs are posted on the website, and craigslist users cannot post ads or create accounts on the craigslist website without first agreeing to the TOUs. (Compl. ¶¶ 32-36; FAC ¶¶ 33-37.) The TOUs protect craigslist users and, according to Plaintiff, preserve the simplicity, ease of use, and fairness that are foundations of its website and services. (FAC ¶¶ 9-10.)
Plaintiffs TOU grants users a limited license to access and use Plaintiffs website subject to certain restrictions. (Compl. ¶ 33; FAC ¶ 34.) In particular, the TOU expressly prohibit users from engaging in repeated postings of similar content, posting ads on behalf of others, gaining unauthorized access to Plaintiffs computer systems, and using automated posting devices or computer programs that enable the submission of postings on craigslist.com without each posting being manually entered by the author thereof, including the use of any such automated posting device to submit postings in bulk for automatic submission of postings at regular intervals. & .)
In an effort to prevent users from using automated posting devices, Plaintiff employs a number of security measures to protect its website. (Compl. ¶¶ 49-61; FAC ¶¶ 50-62.) These measures include providing users with temporary email addresses, telephone verification for ads, and use of "Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart" ("CAPTCHA") software, which is capable of determining whether an ad is being posted by a computer or a human. (Id.) Plaintiff employs CAPTCHAs to ensure that user accounts and user ads are created and posted manually (as required by the TOUs) and not by automated means. (Compl. ¶¶ 53, 54; FAC ¶¶ 54, 55.) CAPTCHAs therefore prevent automatic posters from using, accessing, and copying copyright-protected portions of Plaintiffs website, including its post to classifieds and account registration features, and protect Plaintiffs intellectual property rights. (Compl. ¶¶ 54-56, 69; FAC ¶¶ 55-57, 70.)
Plaintiff also employs telephone verification in certain categories of ads to prevent automated, repetitious, unauthorized, unlawful, and abusive postings. (Compl. ¶¶ 57-58; FAC ¶¶ 58-59.) Telephone verification also prevents posters from using, accessing, and copying...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Elec. Frontier Found. v. Global Equity Mgmt. (SA) Pty Ltd., Case No. 17–cv–02053–JST
...Because the second and third factors are so closely related, the Court examines them together. See Craigslist, Inc. v. Naturemarket, Inc., 694 F.Supp.2d 1039, 1055, 1060 (N.D. Cal. 2010).a. Likelihood of prevailing under the SPEECH ActThe SPEECH Act provides protections for U.S. persons aga......
-
Yelp Inc. v. Catron
...his scheme was directed at Yelp's website, a company he knew to be located in California. See also C raigslist, Inc. v. Naturemarket, Inc., 694 F.Supp.2d 1039, 1053 (N.D.Cal.2010) (“Because Plaintiff is headquartered in California and maintains its website in California, Defendants' actions......
-
Kelly v. Roker
...PepsiCo, Inc. v. Cal. Sec. Cans, 238 F. Supp. 2d 1172, 1177 (C.D. Cal. 2002) (citation omitted); see Craigslist, Inc. v. Naturemarket, Inc., 694 F. Supp. 2d 1039, 1061 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (finding that entry of default judgment is warranted where a defendant's failure to appear makes a decisio......
-
Craigslist, Inc. v. Kerbel, No. C-11-3309 EMC
...federal statutory claims, and its state law claims are integrally related to the federal claims. See Craigslist, Inc. v. Naturemarket, Inc., 694 F. Supp. 2d 1039, 1051-52 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (so holding). However, because Defendant is a Minnesota resident, it is necessary to examine personal j......
-
§ 3.02 Digital Millennium Copyright Act
...the Court finds that damages under the Copyright Act to be the most appropriate remedy." [196] Craigslist, Inc. v. Naturemarket, Inc., 694 F. Supp. 2d 1039 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (distribution of anti-circumvention device was "knowing and intentional" and award in the middle range of $1,000 per d......
-
The Best Laid Plans: How Dmca Sec. 1201 Went Awry, Smothering Competition and Creating Giants,and Where We Go Now
...to connect purchased phones to any wireless service network they choose).88. See generally Craigslist, Inc. v. Naturemarket, Inc., 694 F. Supp. 2d 1039 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (concerning the defendant's operation of a website that helped automate Craigslist ad postings); Craigslist, Inc. v. Huber......
-
"undercover Teachers" Beware: How That Fake Profile on Facebook Could Land You in the Pokey - Paul F. ("pete") Welborn Iii
...895. 51. 720 F. Supp. 2d 904 (S.D. Ohio 2010). 52. Id. at 926-27. 53. 708 F. Supp. 2d 669 (N.D. Ohio 2010). 54. Id. at 678, 680. 55. 694 F. Supp. 2d 1039 (N.D. Cal. 2010). 56. Id. at 1048-50, 1056-57. the website owner. This judicial concern, however, is arguably misplaced because virtually......