Crane v. Darling
Decision Date | 03 May 1899 |
Citation | 71 Vt. 295,44 A. 359 |
Parties | CRANE v. DARLING. |
Court | Vermont Supreme Court |
Exceptions from Caledonia county court.
Action for slander by E. M. Crane against S. E. Darling. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant excepts. Affirmed.
The words were alleged to have been spoken of and concerning the plaintiff in his professional capacity as a physician and with the innuendoes stated in the opinion of the court. The words were:
Taylor & Dutton, for plaintiff.
Barber & Darling, for defendant.
Though not shown by the record, it is conceded in argument that the only question now made on the demurrer was not made below. This being so, the question cannot be raised thereunder here, for the reason given in State v. Preston, 48 Vt. 12. It is unnecessary, therefore, to consider whether the order to replead without prejudice to the demurrer is effective to reserve the benefit of it to the demurrant.
The declaration contains three counts, and alleges that, before and at the time of speaking the words declared upon, the plaintiff was, and ever since has been, and still is, a physician, and that the words were spoken of and concerning him as such, and of and concerning his treatment of a certain Currier boy. It appeared in evidence that the plaintiff was a graduate of the medical department of the University of Vermont at the time he treated the boy, and was then practicing medicine at Hardwick, and had a license to practice from the board of censors of the Vermont Medical Society, but that his license had not been recorded in the Medical Register, as required by statute, but was recorded therein before the speaking of the words. The statute is that if a person practices medicine, and is not duly authorized by a certificate issued and recorded as therein provided, he shall be fined. V. S. § 4638. Therefore the defendant claims that the plaintiff could not be slandered in his profession by words spoken after his certificate was recorded, concerning his treatment of the boy before it was recorded, for that the actionable quality of the words must be determined as of the time of that treatment, at which time he was not a physician, as he had no right to practice, and therefore had no professional character as a physician, and that his subsequent authorization did not change his legal status as to prior acts. But the jury has found, under a charge not excepted to on this point, that the defendant meant to charge the plaintiff with general professional ignorance and incompetency as a physician, and used the case of said boy merely as illustrative of the charge; and also meant to charge him with general professional misconduct and dishonesty in the means habitually resorted to by him to obtain practice. This meaning certainly touched the plaintiff in his profession at the time the words were spoken, and therefore makes them actionable if they are susceptible of that meaning, which is the one ascribed to them in the innuendoes; and that they are susceptible of it we have no doubt The court limited recovery to the first and second counts, which declared upon words spoken at Taylor & Dutton's office. The third count, on which recovery was denied, declared upon a part only of what the defendant...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Landau v. Schmitt Contracting Co.
...v. North New York B. & Y. Assn., 7 Misc. 188, 27 N.Y.S. 314; Missouri, K. & T.R. Co. v. Johnson (Tex.), 67 S.W. 768; Crane v. Darling, 71 Vt. 295, 44 Atl. 359. (4) The court having ruled that the matter in question was one upon which defendant could offer proof, defendant's counsel, in his ......
-
Raymond v. International Business Machines Corp.
...if the defendant knows that of necessity the plaintiff must disclose the statement. Id. IBM has cited the case of Crane v. Darling, 71 Vt. 295, 300, 44 A. 359 (1899) as authority for the contention that Vermont has refused to recognize the doctrine of compelled self-publication. In Crane, a......
-
Landau v. Fred Schmitt Contracting Co.
...v. North New York B. & Y. Assn., 7 Misc. 188, 27 N.Y.S. 314; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Johnson (Tex.), 67 S.W. 768; Crane v. Darling, 71 Vt. 295, 44 A. 359. (4) The court having ruled that the matter in question one upon which defendant could offer proof, defendant's counsel, in his openi......
-
Knelman v. Middlebury Coll.
...upon Wilcox v. Moon, 64 Vt. 450, 24 A. 244 (1892) but noting in two other decisions, judges of this court concluded that Crane v. Darling, 71 Vt. 295, 44 A. 359 (1899) supports a conclusion that Vermont does not and would not recognize the doctrine of compelled self-publication). The Restat......