Crane v. Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition Co.

Decision Date17 February 1913
Citation153 S.W. 1076
PartiesCRANE v. KANSAS CITY BASEBALL & EXHIBITION CO. et al.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W. O. Thomas, Judge.

Action by S. J. Crane against the Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition Company and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

L. A. Laughlin, of Kansas City, for appellant. Hadley, Cooper, Neel & Wilson, of Kansas City, for respondents.

JOHNSON, J.

This is an action for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by negligence of defendants. The answer, in addition to a general denial, pleads contributory negligence and assumed risk. The cause was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts, in which it is stipulated that if the facts disclose a good cause of action plaintiff shall have judgment for $100 and costs. The defendants separately requested the court to declare, as a matter of law, that plaintiff is not entitled to recover. These requests were granted, and judgment was rendered for defendants. Plaintiff appealed.

The ruling of the court in giving these declarations of law, to which exceptions were duly made and preserved by plaintiff, requires us to look at the facts from the viewpoint most favorable to plaintiff; and if we should find they will support a reasonable inference that his injury was caused by the negligence pleaded in the petition, unaided by negligence of plaintiff, the conclusion would follow that the court erred in holding, as a matter of law, that plaintiff had no cause of action.

The facts of the case are as follows: The defendants are the owners of a baseball park in Kansas City, and are engaged in the business of giving public exhibitions of professional baseball. The defendant corporation is a member of a league or association of baseball clubs known as the "American Association." This association is composed of eight professional clubs, and games are played, according to schedule, in the various cities to which the respective clubs are accredited. The home of the club owned and conducted by defendants is in Kansas City, and the games assigned to Kansas City are played in defendants' park, under their management and control. The association and its constituent clubs are purely business enterprises conducted for profit. When a game is played in Kansas City, spectators are compelled to pay admission fees; the fee to the grand stand being 50 cents and to the bleachers 25 cents. The grand stand seats have the advantage over those in the bleachers of being closer to the scene of action, and of having a roof over them. The seating structures are on the west end and north side of the park. The home plate is at the west end of the diamond,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • King v. Kayak Mfg. Corp., 18910
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 9, 1989
    ... ... Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n, 185 Minn. 507, 240 N.W. 903 (1932); e v. Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition, 168 Mo.App. 301, 153 S.W. 1076 ... ...
  • Akins v. Glens Falls City School Dist.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 18, 1981
    ... ... proprietor of a baseball field to the spectators attending its games. The specific question ... (E. g., Crane v. Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition Co., 168 Mo.App. 301, 153 S.W. 1076; ... ...
  • Reed-Jennings v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • May 26, 2015
    ... ... City of Cedar Rapids, 443 N.W.2d 332, 333 (Iowa 1989) ([A baseball stadium ... 627, 62829, 65 S.E.2d 140 (1951) ; Anderson v. Kansas City Baseball Club, 231 S.W.2d 170, 17273 (Mo.1950) ; Brisson v ... State, 174 Ariz. 548, 554, 851 P.2d 847 (1992) ; Crane v. Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition Co., 168 Mo.App. 301, 153 S.W. 1076 ... ...
  • Martinez v. Houston Mclane Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 12, 2013
    ... ... HOUSTON McLANE COMPANY, LLC d/b/a/ Houston Astros Baseball Club, Appellee. No. 01–12–00433–CV. Court of Appeals ... Alamo City Baseball Co., 150 S.W.2d 368 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio ... City Baseball Club, 231 S.W.2d 170 (Mo.1950), and Crane v. Kan. City Baseball & Exhibition Co., 168 Mo.App. 301, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • As Sports Teams Consider Reopening Venues, What Is Their Liability Due To COVID-19?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • June 25, 2020
    ...as the 'Baseball Rule.' The precedent establishing the Baseball Rule dates back to 1913 in Crane v. Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition Co., 153 S.W 1076 (Mo. Ct. App. 1913). In granting summary judgment in favor of the team, the court reasoned that (1) foul balls are inherent to the game of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT