Cranford v. Montgomery County, Md.
| Decision Date | 02 November 1983 |
| Docket Number | Docket No. 398 |
| Citation | 466 A.2d 1291,297 Md. 418 |
| Parties | John CRANFORD et al. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND et al. Petition |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals, 55 Md.App. 276, 462 A.2d 528, and the answer filed thereto, in the above entitled case, it is this 2nd day of November, 1983
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, granted and the writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals shall issue and said case shall be transferred to the regular docket as No. 103, September Term, 1983; and it is further
ORDERED that counsel shall file briefs and printed record extract in accordance with Rule 830, appellant's brief and record extract to be filed on or before forty (40) days from the date the record is docketed in this Court.
DAVIDISON, J., did not participate in the consideration of this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Home for Incurables of Baltimore City v. MARYLAND MEDICAL, 132
...v. Ellicott, 90 Md. 321, 331-333, 45 A. 183, 187-188 (1900); Martin v. Young, 55 Md.App. 401, 404-408, 462 A.2d 77, 78-81,cert. denied, 297 Md. 418 (1983). University Hospital argued that the controlling factor in the case was Dr. Coggins's intention and that, based on the language of the w......
-
Muffoletto v. Melick
...which has arisen." This Court addressed the issue more recently in Martin v. Young, 55 Md.App. 401, 462 A.2d 77, cert. denied 297 Md. 418 (1983). In a 1971 codicil, the testatrix there devised her home to her longtime nurse-employee Gladys Martin "if she survives me and is in my [employ] at......
-
Miller v. Forty West Builders, Inc.
...by case law regarding zoning actions. See e.g. Klein v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 55 Md.App. 324, 337, 462 A.2d 546, cert. denied, 297 Md. 418 (1983). Appellants' contention, that this standard conflicts with the Baltimore County Charter Section 603 which requires de novo hearings before the B......
- Trevor A., In re