Crawford v. Hebrew

Decision Date06 June 1908
Docket Number14,988
PartiesF. J. CRAWFORD v. MINNIE M. HEBREW
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Decided January, 1908.

Error from Pottawatomie district court; ROBERT C. HEIZER, judge.

Judgment affirmed.

B. H. Tracy, for plaintiff in error.

J. K. Codding, W. J. Keyser, and E. C. Warfel, for defendant in error.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is a controversy over a strip of land along the line between two adjoining farms. For more than fifteen years the two farms had been separated by a fence, which the respective owners assumed to be upon the line. A legal survey, made not long before the commencement of this action, established the true line a few feet west of the fence, on the land occupied by the plaintiff in error, who claimed the ownership of the land by adverse possession. The defendant in error brought the action to recover the land. The plaintiff in error testified on the trial as follows:

"Ques. All the years, Mr. Crawford, that you have occupied the land that you have testified to, you occupied it under the claim that that was the line? Ans. Yes, sir.

"Q. The line that divided you from these other pieces of land? A. Yes, sir."

The court found in favor of the plaintiff.

Under this evidence the defendant occupied the strip under the mistake that the fence was on the true boundary-line and without any intention to hold the land beyond his true line or to claim land which did not belong to him. Under these facts he can not acquire title to such strip by adverse possession. (Scott v. Williams, 74 Kan. 448, 87 P. 550.)

The judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Edwards v. Fleming
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1911
    ...v. Ramala, 63 Kan. 633, 66 P. 649; Shanline v. Wiltsie, 70 Kan. 177, 78 P. 436; Scott v. Williams, 74 Kan. 448, 87 P. 550; Crawford v. Hebrew, 78 Kan. 401, 96 P. 348. cases, however, recognize the doctrine that the character of the possession depends upon the intent with which it is taken a......
  • Theron T. Kinne v. Waggoner
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • April 9, 1921
    ...intention to claim and hold adversely. (Winn v. Abeles, 35 Kan. 85, 10 P. 443; Scott v. Williams, 74 Kan. 448, 87 P. 550; Crawford v. Hebrew, 78 Kan. 401, 96 P. 348; Edwards v. Fleming, 83 Kan. 653, 112 P. Peterson v. Hollis, 90 Kan. 655, 136 P. 258; Winters v. Bloom, 96 Kan. 443, 151 P. 11......
  • Zehner v. Castle
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • April 19, 1915
    ... ... 601, 18 L. R. A. 361; Scott v. Williams, 74 ... Kan. 448, 87 P. 550; Shanline v. Wiltsie, 70 Kan ... 77, 78 P. 436, 3 Ann. Cas. 140; Crawford v. Hebrew, 78 Kan ... 401, 96 P. 348.) ... H ... Taylor and W. N. Scales, for Respondent ... Where ... coterminous owners ... ...
  • State v. Nation
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1908
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT