Crawford v. The State Of Ga.
| Decision Date | 28 February 1882 |
| Citation | Crawford v. The State Of Ga., 68 Ga. 822 (Ga. 1882) |
| Parties | Crawford. vs. The State of Georgia. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
1.Where an indictment charged a defendant with "breaking and entering the depot of the Savannah, Florida and Western railway, a corporation chartered by said state, doing business under said name, " the allegation that the owner was a corporation chartered by said state was mere surplusage and need not be proved, I Bish.Crim. Proc, §§234-5; 3 McLean, 333; 5 T. Rep,, 311;50 Ga., 591.
2.The verdict is supported by the evidence.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Mattox v. State
... ... in the indictment was stolen from a house ... Error ... from city court of Valdosta; W. H. Griffin, Judge ... Lawson ... Mattox was convicted of larceny, and brings error. Affirmed ... Crawford ... Walker and Jos. M. Johnson, for plaintiff in error ... S. M ... Varnadoe, O. M. Smith, and C. L. Smith, for the State ... COBB, ... The ... accused was arraigned in the city court of Valdosta under an ... indictment charging him ... ...
- Long v. State
-
Nickles v. State
...92 Ga. 47, 17 S.E. 1006, it was held that such a defect cannot be reached after verdict by a motion in arrest of judgment. In Crawford v. State, 68 Ga. 822, it was held the allegation that the property stolen was that of a corporation chartered by the State was surplusage and need not be pr......
-
State v. Missio
...Norton v. State, 74 Ind. 337, it was held that the corporate existence would be implied without being specially averred. And in Crawford v. State, 68 Ga. 822, it is that such averment is surplusage. But, whether this be the correct rule or not, we think that in a collateral matter, as this ......
Get Started for Free