Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Citation | Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc., 234 S.E.2d 2, 292 N.C. 467 (N.C. 1977) |
| Decision Date | 05 April 1977 |
| Parties | Louie J. CRAWLEY v. SOUTHERN DEVICES, INC. and Zurich-American, Inc., Company, Carrier. |
James A. Simpson, for plaintiff.
Patton, Starnes, Thompson & Daniel, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under GS 7A-31. 31 N.C.App. 284, 229 S.E.2d 325. Denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Curtis v. Gaines Motor Lines, Inc.
...(quoting Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc., 31 N.C. App. 284, 288-89, 229 S.E.2d 325, 328-29 (1976), disc. review denied, 292 N.C. 467, 234 S.E.2d 2 (1977)). The point at which the injury has stabilized is often called "maximum medical improvement." Johnson v. City of Winston-Salem, 188 N.C......
-
Dawes v. Autumn Care of Marshville, No. COA08-190 (N.C. App. 1/6/2009)
...is duly established."Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc., 31 N.C. App. 284, 289, 229 S.E.2d 325, 329 (1976), disc. rev. denied, 292 N.C. 467, 234 S.E.2d 2 (1977). Plaintiff argues that she has not reached maximum medical improvement because she started to develop a plantar fascia condition an......
-
Byrd v. Ecofibers, Inc., I.C. NO. 222823 (NC 3/20/2006)
...improvement. Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc., 31 N.C. App. 284, 288-89, 229 S.E.2d 325, 328-29 (1976), disc. rev. denied, 292 N.C. 467, 234 S.E.2d 2 (1977). 4. Plaintiff is entitled to have defendants pay for medical expenses incurred or to be incurred as a result of the compensable injur......
