Crazytown Furniture, Inc. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

Decision Date08 May 1989
PartiesCRAZYTOWN FURNITURE, INC., et al., Respondents, v. BROOKLYN UNION GAS COMPANY, Appellant, Bargain-Ware Holding Corp., et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Cullen and Dykman, Brooklyn (John J. Fanning, of counsel), for appellant.

Gwertzman, Pfeffer, Toker & Lefkowitz, New York City (Barbara J. Marcus, of counsel), for respondent Crazytown Furniture, Inc.

Speyer & Perlberg, New York City (Gay H. Snyder, of counsel), for respondents Dolgin Enterprises, Ltd. and Dolgin-Reidman Associates, Inc.

Weiner, Aliano & Catlett, New York City (Michael I. Josephs, of counsel), for defendants (relying on the briefs of the respondents).

Before BROWN, J.P., and LAWRENCE, EIBER and SULLIVAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated January 22, 1988, which, inter alia, (1) granted the motion of the plaintiffs Dolgin Enterprises, Ltd. and Dolgin-Reidman Associates, Inc. to compel the appellant to produce four additional witnesses for examination before trial, (2) in effect granted those branches of the cross motion of Crazytown Furniture, Inc. and the cross application of Dolgin Enterprises, Ltd. and Dolgin-Reidman Associates, Inc. which were for a protective order barring the disclosure of experts' reports to the extent of barring the disclosure of experts' reports prepared solely for litigation, and (3) granted those branches of the cross motion and cross application which were for a protective order barring disclosure of the plaintiffs' proof of loss statements.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs; and it is further ORDERED that the depositions of the four additional witnesses shall occur at times and places to be provided in written notices of not less than 10 days, or at such times and places as the parties may agree.

The plaintiffs met their burden of showing that the witness produced by the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company possessed "inadequate knowledge as to matters bearing on material issues in the case, which knowledge would assist the plaintiffs in preparation for trial" (Simon v. Advance Equip. Co., 126 A.D.2d 632, 511 N.Y.S.2d 68; see also, Schillaci v. Jamaica Sav. & Loan, 90 A.D.2d 770, 455 N.Y.S.2d 294). Therefore, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in directing the depositions of the four additional witnesses named at the original deposition who actually made the service calls to the premises at issue and would be most familiar with material facts necessary to the plaintiffs' case (see, Allen v. Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403, 288 N.Y.S.2d 449, 235 N.E.2d...

To continue reading

Request your trial
73 cases
  • Forman v. Henkin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Diciembre 2015
    ...on the claims' " (Vyas v. Campbell, 4 A.D.3d 417, 418, 771 N.Y.S.2d 375 [2d Dept.2004], quoting Crazytown Furniture v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 150 A.D.2d 420, 421, 541 N.Y.S.2d 30 [2d Dept.1989] ; see also GS Plasticos Limitada v. Bureau Veritas Consumer Prods. Servs., Inc., 112 A.D.3d 539,......
  • Baker v. Comprehensive Mental Assessment & Med. Care
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 8 Enero 2010
    ...or is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of information bearing on the claims.” Id., Crazytown Furniture v. Brooklyn Union Gas, 150 A.D.2d 420, 421, 541 N.Y.S.2d 30 (2d Dep't 1989); see, Acosta v. Hadjigavriel, 6 A.D.3d 636, 775 N.Y.S.2d 179 (2d Dep't 2004). Moreover, supervisio......
  • Wunderlich v. Liberty Meadows, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 1 Junio 2020
    ... ... Inc., 136 .A.D.3d 721, 721, 25 N.Y.S.3d 289, 290 [2d ... claims" (Crazytown Furniture v. Brooklyn Union Gas ... Co., 150 A.D.2d ... ...
  • Gomez v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 15 Mayo 2013
    ...information bearing on the claims' " (Vyas v. Campbell, 4 A.D.3d 417, 418, 771 N.Y.S.2d 375, quoting Crazytown Furniture v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 150 A.D.2d 420, 421, 541 N.Y.S.2d 30). The moving party that is seeking additional depositions has the burden of demonstrating "(1) that the re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • How To Manage A Company’s Social Media Presence
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 16 Mayo 2013
    ...of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action." See FRCP 26(b)(1). 27 Crazytown Furniture v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 150 A.D.2d 420, 421 (2d Dept. 1989). The FRCP make this explicit by stating that the information sought "need not be admissible" if the discovery "appear......
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT