Cressman v. Thompson

Docket Number14-6020
Decision Date04 August 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
36 cases
  • State v. Carter
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • August 2, 2021
    ..."the Federal Government or a State ... compels [individuals] to voice ideas with which they disagree"); see also Cressman v. Thompson, 798 F.3d 938, 963 (10th Cir. 2015) (stating, in a case involving symbolic speech, that "merely objecting to the fact that the government has required speech......
  • 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • July 26, 2021
    ...genuine dispute of material fact as to whether university's compulsion of theater student's speech was pretextual); Cressman v. Thompson , 798 F.3d 938, 951 (10th Cir. 2015) (discussing the long prohibition on compelled speech); Phelan v. Laramie Cty. Cmty. Coll. Bd. of Trustees , 235 F.3d ......
  • Robar v. Vill. of Potsdam Bd. of Trs.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York
    • September 21, 2020
    ...more than common, ‘everyday’ toilets and urinals").6 Some other circuits have reached different conclusions. See Cressman v. Thompson, 798 F.3d 938, 954–56 (10th Cir. 2015) (collecting authorities from the Third, Sixth, and Eleventh Circuits).7 The Court relies on these news articles not fo......
  • Brush & Nib Studio, LC v. City of Phx.
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • September 16, 2019
    ...and thus "entitled to full First Amendment protection")). ¶59 Pure speech also includes original artwork. See Cressman v. Thompson , 798 F.3d 938, 952 (10th Cir. 2015) (holding that paintings, drawings, and original artwork are protected pure speech); White v. City of Sparks , 500 F.3d 953,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The First Amendment walks into a bar: trademark registration and free speech.
    • United States
    • Notre Dame Law Review Vol. 92 No. 1, November - November 2016
    • November 1, 2016
    ...(stating that the reasonable observer considers history and context in determining meaning of government action); Cressman v. Thompson, 798 F.3d 938, 958 (10th Cir. 2015) ("As the contours of the Establishment Clause's reasonable-observer test have been sketched over the years, it has becom......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT