Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc.

Decision Date18 February 1986
Docket NumberNo. 0241-85,0241-85
CitationCrisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 339 S.E.2d 916, 1 Va.App. 503 (Va. App. 1986)
PartiesJennifer Marie CRISP v. BROWN'S TYSONS CORNER DODGE, INC. Record
CourtVirginia Court of Appeals

Peter M. Sweeney (James E. Swiger, Ashcraft & Gerel, Alexandria, on brief), for appellant.

Susan A. Evans (Siciliano, Ellis, Sheridan, Dyer & Boccarosse, Fairfax, on brief), for appellee.

Present: DUFF, MOON and COLE, JJ.

MOON, Judge.

Jennifer Marie Crisp, appellant, seeks reversal of a decision of the Industrial Commission which denied her compensation. She asks that we rule as a matter of law that her disability between May 3, 1984, through June 4, 1984, was causally related to injuries suffered by an industrial accident on April 11, 1984. We decline to do so and affirm the Commission's decision because the evidence does not prove that her disability resulted from her injury on April 11, 1984.

The Industrial Commission's findings of fact must be sustained on appeal when supported by credible evidence. Lewis v. Lynchburg Foundry Co., 204 Va. 303, 305, 130 S.E.2d 429, 431 (1963); Code § 65.1-98. As the Supreme Court of Virginia stated in Caskey v. Dan River Mills, Inc., 225 Va. 405, 302 S.E.2d 507 (1983):

We do not retry the facts before the Commission nor do we review the weight, preponderance of the evidence, or the credibility of witnesses. If there is evidence or reasonable inference that can be drawn from the evidence to support the Commission's findings, they will not be disturbed by this Court on appeal, even though there is evidence in the record to support contrary findings of fact.

Id. at 411, 302 S.E.2d at 510-11. (citations omitted). We are, therefore, required to construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, the employer, Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge. See United Virginia Bank v. E.L.B. Tank Construction Co., 226 Va. 551, 553, 311 S.E.2d 773, 774 (1984).

On April 11, 1984, Jennifer Marie Crisp experienced back pain while lifting a box of machine parts. She did not report the incident to her employer at that time and continued to work until April 17, 1984, when she sought medical treatment from Dr. Stanford Lavine, an orthopedic surgeon. She told Dr. Lavine that she had low back pain "for the past two weeks." (emphasis added). Her description of the onset of pain two weeks earlier would place the origin of the pain eight days prior to the alleged injury date. She also told him that she was having right knee and low back pain which had worsened during the preceding two days. She gave him no history that indicated that she had injured her back on April 11, 1984. Also, on April 17, 1984, Crisp resigned from her employment with Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge and began working as a car cleaner for another automobile dealer. She worked for the second dealer until May 4, 1984, when she was taken to the Commonwealth Hospital emergency room and was admitted by Dr. Norman Marcus. Dr. Marcus' notes state that "[s]he was felt to have a recurrent soft tissue injury of the lumbar spine." There were also notes in the record raising the question of a possible herniated disc or degenerative disc disease. Crisp testified that she had not had any...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
55 cases
  • Marketing Profiles, Inc. v. Hill
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • November 30, 1993
    ...award. Viewed in the light most favorable to Hill, who prevailed before the commission, see Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 1 Va.App. 503, 504, 339 S.E.2d 916, 916 (1986), the evidence at the evidentiary hearing proved that Hill was director of photography for Marketing Profiles......
  • Util. Trailer Mfg. Co. v. Testerman
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • July 12, 2011
    ...obligation to examine the facts in the light most favorable to the claimant, who prevailed below. Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 1 Va.App. 503, 504, 339 S.E.2d 916, 916 (1986). Nevertheless, the facts, as they are, seem to require further examination by the fact-finder to evalu......
  • Corporate Resource Mgmt., Inc. v. Southers
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 2007
    ...before the commission, I recite that evidence in the light most favorable to claimant. See, e.g., Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 1 Va.App. 503, 504, 339 S.E.2d 916, 916 (1986). Claimant sustained an injury by accident on May 23, 2003, when she was vacuuming and fell backward do......
  • Montalbano v. Richmond Ford, LLC
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 2010
    ...the party who prevailed before the commission." Gunst, 29 Va.App. at 707, 514 S.E.2d at 386 (citing Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 1 Va.App. 503, 504, 339 S.E.2d 916, 916 (1986)). The claimant has the burden of proving maximum medical improvement. See Mercy Tidewater Ambulance ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • 2.6 Injury by Accident
    • United States
    • Virginia CLE Workers' Compensation Practice in Virginia (Virginia CLE) Chapter 2 Coverage of Accidental Injuries
    • Invalid date
    ...(1938).[381] Virginia Dep't of Transp. v. Mosebrook, 13 Va. App. 536, 413 S.E.2d 350 (1992); Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 1 Va. App. 503, 339 S.E.2d 916 (1986); see also Shelton v. Ennis Bus. Forms, Inc., 1 Va. App. 53, 334 S.E.2d 297 (1985).[382] Bristol Builders Supply Co. ......