Cromwell v. CRP 482 Riverdale Ave., LLC

Decision Date11 July 2018
Docket Number2017–00206,Index No. 7742/13
Citation163 A.D.3d 626,80 N.Y.S.3d 423
Parties Jerome CROMWELL, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v. CRP 482 RIVERDALE AVENUE, LLC, et al., appellants; New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., et al., nonparty-respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

163 A.D.3d 626
80 N.Y.S.3d 423

Jerome CROMWELL, et al., plaintiffs-respondents,
v.
CRP 482 RIVERDALE AVENUE, LLC, et al., appellants;

New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., et al., nonparty-respondents.

2017–00206
Index No. 7742/13

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Argued—March 15, 2018
July 11, 2018


80 N.Y.S.3d 424

Hannum Feretic Prendergast & Merlino, LLC, New York, N.Y. (Matthew J. Zizzamia of counsel), for appellants.

Kenneth J. Ready, Mineola, N.Y. (Gregory S. Gennarelli of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Deborah A. Brenner and Eric Lee of counsel), for nonparty-respondents.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Donald Scott Kurtz, J.), dated November 1, 2016. The order denied the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 602(a) to join for trial this action with an action entitled Cromwell v. Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 3490/14.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff Jerome Cromwell (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) allegedly injured his foot when he stepped in a rodent hole on property owned by the defendant CRP 482 Riverdale Avenue, LLC, and managed by the defendant Liberty Place

80 N.Y.S.3d 425

Property Management, LLC (hereinafter together the property defendants). The injured plaintiff, and his wife suing derivatively, subsequently commenced this action against the property defendants, seeking damages on theories of negligent maintenance of the property, nuisance, and breach of the warranty of habitability under Real Property Law § 235–b. Approximately one year later, the plaintiffs commenced a separate action against Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, as well as New York City Health and Hospitals Corp. and Kings County Hospital Center (hereinafter together the City defendants), based on their treatment of Cromwell's foot injury, seeking damages under theories of medical malpractice and lack of informed consent.

Discovery was thereafter completed in this action, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Francis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 22, 2023
    ...an opposing party or pose a risk of confusing the jury or rendering the litigation unwieldy" ( Cromwell v. CRP 482 Riverdale Ave., LLC, 163 A.D.3d 626, 627–628, 80 N.Y.S.3d 423 [citations omitted]; see Weiss & Biheller, MDSE, Corp. v. Preciosa USA, Inc., 127 A.D.3d 1176, 1176, 5 N.Y.S.3d 90......
  • HSBC Bank U.S. v. Francis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 22, 2023
    ...an opposing party or pose a risk of confusing the jury or rendering the litigation unwieldy" (Cromwell v CRP 482 Riverdale Ave., LLC, 163 A.D.3d 626, 627-628 [citations omitted]; see Weiss & Biheller, MDSE, Corp. v Preciosa USA, Inc., 127 A.D.3d 1176, 1176; American Home Mtge. Servicing, In......
  • Bacelic v. Gordon
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • February 9, 2021
    ...for a joint trial may be denied when the actions are at markedly different procedural stages (see Cromwell v CRP 482 Riverdale Ave., LLC, 163 A.D.3d 626, 80 N.Y.S.3d 423 [2d Ve&lWM]', Skelly v Sachem Cent. Sch. Dist., 309 A.D.2d 917, 766 N.Y.S.2d 108 [2d Dept 2003]; Cont. Bldg. Co. v Town o......
  • Dumervil v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • July 11, 2018
    ...eligibility to collect workers' compensation benefits is the employee's exclusive remedy against an employer for job-related injuries 80 N.Y.S.3d 423(see Workers' Compensation Law §§ 11, 29[6] ; Isabella v. Hallock, 22 N.Y.3d 788, 792–793, 987 N.Y.S.2d 293, 10 N.E.3d 673 ; Reich v. Manhatta......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT