Cross v. Willis, 4 Div. 422.

Decision Date30 June 1938
Docket Number4 Div. 422.
Citation182 So. 480,28 Ala.App. 271
PartiesCROSS v. WILLIS.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Russell County; J. S. Williams, Judge.

Habeas corpus proceeding by J. C. Cross, petitioner, against Mrs. W H. Willis, respondent. From a decree for petitioner respondent appeals, and petitioner moves to dismiss.

Appeal dismissed.

Roy L Smith, of Phenix City, for appellant.

J. B. Hicks, of Phenix City, for appellee.

BRICKEN Presiding Judge.

It appears from the "Certificate of Appeal" filed in this proceeding, in this court, on March 24, 1938, that this is a habeas corpus proceeding for the custody of a minor child, and that the cause was tried and determined below on the 17th day of March 1938, and a decree rendered in favor of petitioner awarding the minor child to him. Further, that respondent took an appeal from said decree, or judgment, on the 23rd day of March 1938, to this court.

This court is vested with jurisdiction in causes of this character. Montgomery v. Hughes et al., 4 Ala.App. 245, 58 So. 113; Phelps v. McLeod, 17 Ala.App. 480, 86 So. 150.

The requirements and provisions of Section 3238 of the Code 1923, as amended by Acts of Alabama Extra Session 1936, p. 81, not having been complied with, the appellee, on May 17, 1938, filed in this court a motion to dismiss this appeal, said motion being in words and figures as follows:

"In the Court of Appeals of the State of Alabama
"W. H. Willis, Appellant, v. J. C. Cross, Appellee
"Habeas Corpus
"Appeal from the Circuit Court of Russell County, Alabama, in Equity, Northern Division; Judge J. S. Williams, Judge.
"To the Hon. Charles R. Bricken, Presiding Judge:
"Comes now J. C. Cross, appellee, and by his attorney of record, J. B. Hicks, and files this his motion to dismiss said appeal and for grounds says:
"That on the 21st day of March, 1938 a decree was rendered in favor of the appellee against the appellant by the Hon. J. S. Williams, Judge, and that an appeal was taken therefrom.
"That whereas, the said appellant has failed within thirty days from the date of said judgment and the Clerk or Register of the Circuit Court of Russell County, Alabama from which said appeal is taken has failed to within thirty days from the date of said judgment to forward a transcript of the record and a certificate of appeal to the Court of Appeals, together with a statement of the evidence and the Judge's ruling thereon, certified to be correct by the Judge or officer hearing the petition, as provided by the Acts of 1936, page 81.
"Further, that notice of the filing of this motion was given to the Hon. Roy L. Smith, attorney of record for the Appellant, together with a copy of this motion more than one day before the 26th day of May, 1938. A copy of said notice is hereto attached and marked Exhibit 'A.'

"Wherefore the premises considered the petitioner prays that said cause be dismissed on the grounds herein stated.

"J. B. Hicks
"Solicitor for Appellee."

The facts upon which the foregoing motion is predicated appear ample in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Herrmann v. Robinson, 1 Div. 151
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 1 Noviembre 1966
    ...We note the following cases: McTyre v. State, 258 Ala. 637, 64 So.2d 601; Glenn v. Glenn, 21 Ala.App. 148, 106 So. 226; Cross v. Willis, 28 Ala.App. 271, 182 So. 480; Downs v. Norris, 32 Ala.App. 381, 26 So.2d 418; Thomas v. State, 34 Ala.App. 160, 37 So.2d 245; State v. Patton, 36 Ala.App.......
  • Phillips v. State, 3 Div. 52
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 16 Agosto 1960
    ...657, 43 So.2d 321; Callahan v. State, 33 Ala.App. 362, 33 So.2d 743; Downs v. Norris, 32 Ala.App. 381, 26 So.2d 418; Cross v. Willis, 28 Ala.App. 271, 182 So. 480. From the record it appears that the provisions of the statute have not been complied with, and the delay must be attributed to ......
  • Summers v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 22 Junio 1943
    ...15 So.2d 500 31 Ala.App. 264 SUMMERS v. STATE. 3 Div. 858.Alabama Court of AppealsJune 22, 1943 ... On ... October 4, 1938, appellant was convicted of grand larceny and ... Glenn, 21 Ala.App. 148, 106 So. 226; Cross v ... Willis, 28 Ala.App. 271, 182 So. 480; Hurd v ... ...
  • Thomas v. State, 6 Div. 714.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 19 Octubre 1948
    ... ... See also, Kitonis v. State, ... Ala.App., 34 So.2d 870; Cross v. Willis, 28 ... Ala.App. 271, 182 So. 480; Downs v. Norris, 32 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT