Crouch v. County Court Of Wyo. County, 8191.

Decision Date08 October 1935
Docket NumberNo. 8191.,8191.
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
PartiesCROUCH. v. COUNTY COURT OF WYOMING COUNTY.

181 S.E. 819

CROUCH.
v.
COUNTY COURT OF WYOMING COUNTY.

No. 8191.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Oct. 8, 1935.


[181 S.E. 819]
Syllabus by the Court.

Where an assessment of real estate of an amount ($50,000 or more: Code 1931, 11-3-25) reviewable by the supreme court of appeals, appears to have been made without proper regard to requisite elements and to have been approved by the circuit court without substantial evidence to sustain the assessed valuation, the appellate court will reverse the circuit court's order of affirmation and will remand the case for further proceedings.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Wyoming County.

Action by E. H. Crouch against the County Court of Wyoming County. From an adverse order, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Carl C. Sanders, of Beckley, for appellant.

Homer A. Holt, Atty. Gen., W. Holt Wooddell, Asst. Atty. Gen., and F. E. Shannon, Pros. Atty., of Pineville, for appellee.

MAXWELL, Judge.

This review involves a Wyoming County land assessment alleged by the owner, E. H. Crouch, to be excessive.

In January, 1933, he bought of the Newberry heirs a tract of about 3600 acres in Clear Fork District of said County and the minerals underlying about 200 acres in Oceana District. The consideration was $75,000.00. For 1933 and 1934 the assessment on the 3600 acre tract was $31.50 per acre, and on the mineral tracts $22.50. The total is between $116,000 and $120,000 (exact amount not disclosed by record). Crouch paid the taxes for 1933. The controversy pertains to the 1934 assessment. This assessment was made by the assessor of Wyoming County, and approved by the county court sitting as a board of review and equalization (Acts 1933, c. 41), and by the circuit court on appeal (Code 1931, 11-3-25).

The statute, Code 1931, 11-3-25, allows appeal to this Court where the assessment is $50,000.00 or more. We will not disturb an assessment which is supported by substantial evidence unless it is plainly wrong. West Penn Power Co. v. Board of Review and Equalization, 112 W. Va. 442, 164 S. E. 862. However, in the instant case we are of opinion that the assessment is not well supported.

The price paid for property is not conclusive as to value, but it may be a very important element of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT