Crowder v. Crowder

Decision Date06 April 1976
Docket NumberNo. 30930,30930
CitationCrowder v. Crowder, 225 S.E.2d 16, 236 Ga. 612 (Ga. 1976)
PartiesEmily Claire CROWDER v. William Howerton CROWDER, III.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

W. Ashley Hawkins, Forsyth, for appellant.

Clarke, Haygood & Lynch, Harold G. Clarke, Forsyth, for appellee.

INGRAM, Justice.

The essence of civil contempt involved in a proceeding to enforce payment of an alimony or child support award is wilful disobedience of the court's order. Georgia Divorce, Alimony, etc., § 14-1. See also Mason v. Mason, 232 Ga. 336, 206 S.E.2d 479 (1974).

The trial court in this case determined that the father had not wilfully disobeyed its earlier order which awarded child support in the amount of $40 per week. There is some evidence that some arrearage may be owed by the father, but we cannot hold the trial court abused its broad discretion in reaching the conclusion that the father had not wilfully disobeyed its order. If there is any evidence in the record to support a trial judge's determination that a party either has or has not wilfully disobeyed the trial court's order, the decision of the trial court will be affirmed on appeal. See Durham v. Spence, 228 Ga. 525, 530, 186 S.E.2d 723 (1972).

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • HAMILTON CAPTIAL GROUP v. Equifax
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 2, 2004
    ...or has not wilfully disobeyed the trial court's order, the decision of the trial court will be affirmed on appeal. Crowder v. Crowder, 236 Ga. 612, 225 S.E.2d 16 (1976).(T)he question of whether a contempt has occurred is for the trial court, and its determination will be overturned only if......
  • Robinson v. Robinson
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 4, 2010
    ...July and August 2009 to the hearing on August 26, 2009. There was no abuse of the trial court's broad discretion. See Crowder v. Crowder, 236 Ga. 612, 225 S.E.2d 16 (1976). 3. The final judgment and decree of divorce awarded Husband the marital residence, and stated that he “shall take all ......
  • Harden v. Harden
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1979
    ...(1962). If there is Any evidence to support the trial court's determination, the judgment must be affirmed on appeal. Crowder v. Crowder, 236 Ga. 612, 225 S.E.2d 16 (1976). The former husband testified that at the end of each month after payment of certain expenses, he was left with $32.02,......
  • Griggers v. Bryant
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1977
    ...child support. The basis for a contempt action is a "wilful" refusal to comply with a judgment or order of the court. Crowder v. Crowder, 236 Ga. 612, 225 S.E.2d 16 (1976); McDonald v. McDonald, 234 Ga. 37, 214 S.E.2d 493 (1975); Crozier v. Crozier, 231 Ga. 486, 202 S.E.2d 412 (1973). In re......
  • Get Started for Free