Crown Iron Works Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev., 15709.
Decision Date | 24 June 1957 |
Docket Number | No. 15709.,15709. |
Citation | 245 F.2d 357 |
Parties | CROWN IRON WORKS COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
O. A. Brecke, St. Paul, Minn., for petitioner.
Harry Marselli, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert N. Anderson and Charles B. E. Freeman, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and JOHNSEN, Circuit Judges.
The Tax Court on August 29, 1956, in a decision not officially reported, sustained a determination of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that there were deficiencies in the income tax of the petitioner, Crown Iron Works Company, for the years 1949 and 1950, of $927.56 and $5,025.31 respectively. The petitioner asks this Court to review and reverse the Tax Court's decision.
The nature of the controversy and the question for review are stated with clarity and brevity in the petition as follows:
Actually the question for this Court to decide is not whether the payments involved were interest on indebtedness within the meaning of § 23(b), Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S. C.A. § 23(b), and deductible, or were dividends on preferred stock and nondeductible, but whether the determination of the tax Court that the payments were dividends, and not interest, was clearly wrong.
The petitioner, in effect, asserts that the preferred stock issued to the Johnsons in connection with the purchase by petitioner of the common stock owned by them was, under the facts stipulated and the evidence adduced before the Tax Court, conclusively shown to have been issued "merely as security for the payment of the balance of the purchase price for the common stock sold by the Johnson family" to petitioner.
The contract for the purchase of the Johnson common stock was entered into January 2, 1945. It provided that $123,500 should be paid for it by petitioner as follows:
Pursuant to this agreement, the petitioner amended its Charter to provide for the preferred stock. The amendment was approved by its stockholders on January 16, 1945. The purchase of the Johnson common stock was finally consummated on February 8, 1945. The Johnsons were paid $38,500 in cash, and 850 shares of preferred stock were issued to them.
The minutes of the meeting of the petitioner's stockholders held January 16, 1945, contain the following:
Nothing appears in the minutes to indicate that the petitioner was intending to pledge this stock as security for the payment of a debt.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Miele v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...of the certificates, Consumers Credit Rural Electric Coop. Corp. v. Commissioner, 319 F.2d 475 (C.A. 6, 1963); Crown Iron Works Co. v. Commissioner, 245 F.2d 357 (C.A. 8, 1957); Kentucky River Coal Corporation, 3 B.T.A. 644 (1926), as it is not unusual for preferred stock to have a maturity......
-
RISS & CO., INC. v. Commissioner, Docket No. 74950-74954
... ... were filed with the district director of internal revenue at Kansas City, Missouri. Richard R ... , petitioners argue, with reference to Rev. Rul. 90, 1953-1 C. B. 43, 6 and Rev. Rul ... 2d 620 (C. A. 7); Crown Iron Works Co. v. Commissioner, 57-2 23 TCM ... ...
-
JS Biritz Construction Co. v. CIR
...the taxpayer has the burden of proof, citing John Kelley Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra; Crown Iron Works v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 245 F.2d 357 (8 Cir. 1957); Arlington Park Jockey Club v. Sauber, 262 F.2d 902, 905 (7 Cir. 1959); and submits that the findings of ......
-
Sachs v. CIR
...9 Cir., 261 F.2d 842, 847, certiorari denied 359 U.S. 966, 79 S.Ct. 877, 3 L.Ed.2d 834, and compare Crown Iron Works Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 8 Cir., 245 F.2d 357, 358; Lengsfield v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 241 F.2d 508. In Boehm v. Commissioner of Internal......