CSI Services, Ltd. v. Hawkins Concrete Const. Co.

Decision Date10 December 1987
Docket NumberBR-293
Citation516 So.2d 337,12 Fla. L. Weekly 2803
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 2803, 5 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 844 CSI SERVICES, LTD., Appellant, v. HAWKINS CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Hawkins Bridge Co., Inc., a Florida corporation, and C. D. Hawkins, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Stephen F. Bolton, of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, Pensacola, for appellant.

Paul A. Rasmussen, of Eggen & Rasmussen, Pensacola, for appellees.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals an amended final judgment denying it's request for a deficiency judgment against appellees, C. D. Hawkins and Hawkins Bridge Co. We reverse and remand.

Without making determinations as to the other issues involved below, such as whether the collateral was sold by appellant for fair market value and whether a novation had occurred, the trial judge denied the deficiency judgment solely on the basis of the fact that appellant undisputedly failed to give Hawkins and Hawkins Bridge Co. notice of the sale of the collateral.

A secured party is required under section 679.504(3), Florida Statutes, to give notice of a sale of repossessed collateral and failure to give such notice generally renders a sale commercially unreasonable. See Landmark First National Bank of Fort Lauderdale v. Gepetto's, 498 So.2d 920 (Fla.1986). However, that failure does not necessarily preclude entry of a deficiency judgment following the sale. As established in Weiner v. American Petrofina Marketing, Inc., 482 So.2d 1362 (Fla.1986) and followed in Gepetto's:

When it has been determined that a secured party has disposed of collateral in a commercially unreasonable manner, there will arise a presumption that the fair market value of the collateral at the time of repossession was equal to the amount of the total debt that it secured. The burden to prove that the fair market value of the collateral was less than the debt will be upon the secured party. If the secured party meets this burden, he will be allowed to recover a deficiency judgment in an amount equal to the total debt minus the fair market value of the collateral as ultimately determined.

In Gepetto's, decided immediately prior to the date of the amended final judgment on appeal, the court specifically found that a sale conducted without prior notice cannot be considered commercially reasonable and it therefore falls within the "rebuttable presumption" rule of Weiner. In that case, the bank argued that the evidence presented...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Morgan v. Kelly, 93-2336
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 14 September 1994
    ...by the court. Norwest Bank Owatonna, N.A. v. Millard, 522 So.2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (citing CSI Servs., Ltd. v. Hawkins Concrete Constr. Co., 516 So.2d 337, 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)). See R.K. Cooper Constr. Co. v. Fulton, 216 So.2d 11 (Fla.1968); Liberty Business Credit Corp. v. Schaffe......
  • Thunderbird, Ltd. v. Great American Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 June 1990
    ...partially guaranteed. Norwest Bank Owatonna, N.A. v. Millard, 522 So.2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); CSI Services, Ltd. v. Hawkins Concrete Construction Co., 516 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). While the foregoing is a correct statement of the law, we disagree with appellants that Great American......
  • Williams v. Kloeppel, 88-585
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 December 1988
    ...(emphasis supplied.) 482 So.2d at 1365. Accord Landmark First National Bank, 498 So.2d at 922; CSI Services, Ltd. v. Hawkins Concrete Construction Co., 516 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The estoppel issue in this case arises in the context of a seeming inconsistency between the asserted va......
  • Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Jones
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 16 August 1991
    ...other defenses are asserted and proven, the secured creditor is entitled to a deficiency judgment. See CSI Services, Ltd. v. Hawkins Concrete Const. Co., 516 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); see generally, Adler v. Key Financial Services, Inc., 553 So.2d 284 (Fla. 3rd DCA Accordingly, the tri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 19-3 Calculation of Deficiency Amounts
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Florida Foreclosure Law 2020 Title Chapter 19 Deficiency Judgments
    • Invalid date
    ...Norwest Bank Owatonna, N.A. v. Millard, 522 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (citing CSI Servs., Ltd. v. Hawkins Concrete Constr. Co., 516 So. 2d 337, 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)). See R.K. Cooper Constr. Co. v. Fulton, 216 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1968); Liberty Bus. Credit Corp. v. Schaffer/Dunadry, 589......
  • Chapter 20-3 Calculation of Deficiency Amounts
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Florida Foreclosure Law 2022 Chapter 20 Deficiency Judgments
    • Invalid date
    ...Norwest Bank Owatonna, N.A. v. Millard, 522 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (citing CSI Servs., Ltd. v. Hawkins Concrete Constr. Co., 516 So. 2d 337, 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)). See R.K. Cooper Constr. Co. v. Fulton, 216 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1968); Liberty Bus. Credit Corp. v. Schaffer/Dunadry, 589......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT