Cuban Trading Co. v. Black Diamond S.S. Corporation
Decision Date | 09 December 1921 |
Citation | 277 F. 857 |
Parties | CUBAN TRADING CO. v. BLACK DIAMOND S.S. CORPORATION. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Shattuck, Glenn & Ganter, of New York City (Garrard Glenn and Frank C. Bowers, both of New York City, of counsel), for the motion.
Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City (John W. Crandall, of New York City, of counsel), opposed.
It will serve no good purpose for me to attempt to discuss the proposition as to whether, under the provisions of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. Sec. 968 et seq.), a citizen of the United States, a nonresident of this district, sued in a state court by an alien plaintiff, is entitled to remove the action to this court upon showing such diversity of citizenship, together with the other requisite jurisdictional elements. In view of the hopeless conflict of authority upon the subject, it would seem that whether such removal can be had depends solely upon the district wherein the alien sues.
As to what may be done here, I must consider the dictum of the Circuit Court of Appeals in Guaranty Trust Co. v. McCabe, 250 F. 699, 163 C.C.A. 31, as binding upon this court. Judge Augustus N. Hand believed it so to be in the Matter of the Petition of Red Cross Line, 277 F. 853, decided June 20, 1921, and upon other occasions, like unto the present, I have acted upon that assumption. I feel constrained to again do so, and will deny the motion to remand.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
George Weston, Ltd. v. N.Y. Cent. R. Co.
...alien against a citizen of a sister state. H. J. Decker, Jr., & Co. v. Southern R. Co. (C. C.) 189 F. 224; Cuban Trading Co. v. Black Diamond S. S. Corporation (D. C.) 277 F. 857; Bagenas v. Southern Pacific Co. (C. C.) 180 F. 887; Matarazzo v. Hustis (D. C.) 256 F. 882; Barlow v. Chicago &......