Culbertson v. Montanbault

Decision Date01 November 1961
Docket NumberNo. 2210,2210
CitationCulbertson v. Montanbault, 133 So.2d 772 (Fla. App. 1961)
PartiesOiiver H. CULBERTSON et us., Appellants, v. Herbert T. MONTANBAULT et ux., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Ed W. Harris, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Raymond Sheldon, Tampa, for appellees.

SMITH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decree quieting title to certain lands declaring the plaintiffs, Herbert T. Montanbault and Bessie M. Montanbault, his wife, who are the appellees here, the owners in fee simple of a 20-acre parcel of land, free and clear of any and all right, claim, or demand of the defendants, Oliver H. Culbertson and Emma C. Culbertson, his wife, the appellants here.In their complaint, the complainants deraign their title as follows:

(a)B. F. Leonard, being the owner of the parcel, conveyed the same to Frank Lette and Lizzie Lette, his wife, by warranty deed dated July 26, 1921, and recorded September 26, 1921:

(b)Lizzie Lette subsequently died;

(c)Frank Lette conveyed the property to complainants by warranty deed dated April 9, 1959, and recorded the next day.

The complaint then alleges that there appears of record the following conveyances which casts a cloud upon plaintiffs' title as follows:

(a)John U. Hemmi and wife conveyed the parcel by warranty deed recorded August 1, 1921, to Oliver Culbertson.

(b)W. H. Gill and wife conveyed the parcel by warranty deed recorded May 12, 1926, to Oliver Culbertson.

(c)Albert Culbertson conveyed the parcel by warranty deed recorded November 4, 1927, to Oliver H. Culbertson.

(d) That the above-mentioned Oliver Culbertson and Oliver H. Culbertson is the same person and is one of the defendants.The complaint further alleged that the complainants were in possession of the parcel of land.

The defendants answered admitting that all of the deeds had been recorded as alleged in the complaint and further affirmatively alleged that a complete search of the records disclosed that B. F. Leonard, who purports to have executed a deed to Lette, had never at any time owned or had any claim of title to the land and that his deed was a 'wild deed'.The answer further denied complainants possession and affirmatively alleged their possession of the land since 1921 and that no adversity had ever been noted against them until complainants attempted to claim title in the year 1959.The answer prayed for affirmative relief and that the complainants be barred from claiming any interest in the land.

From the allegations of the complaint and the admissions of the answer, it was established that the defendant had a prior record title.Testimony was then taken by deposition before the court.There was little, if any, material variance in the evidence given by the witnesses.In brief, Frank Lette testified by deposition as a witness for complainants that he lived on the property which he deeded to Montanbault; that he bought it from Leonard in 1921; built a bungalow on it; lived there from 1921 to 1926; and that no one questioned his ownership of the property, and he paid taxes on it every year until he sold it.It should be noted that his testimony is completely silent on the question of possession subsequent to 1926.

Mr. Montanbault testified to the effect that he looked at the property in 1959, bought it from Lette, recorded the deed and in January, 1960, fenced the south and west sides tying his fencing into the existing fence on the north and east sides.The above testimony, plus documentary evidence of the deeds and payment of taxes, constituted all of the testimony of the complainants.

Mabel M. Gill testified as a witness for the defendant, by deposition, to the effect that there were three parties who had interest in the parcel of land in 1921, and that by the deed recorded August 1, 1921, Hemmi conveyed his interest to Oliver H. Culbertson; that by the deed recorded May 12, 1926, she and her husband conveyed their interest to Culbertson; and that by the deed dated November 4, 1927, Albert Culbertson conveyed his interest to Oliver H. Culbertson.She testified that she and her husband bought the property in question and between 1914 and 1917they put a fence around it...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • McLemore v. McLemore
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 4, 1996
    ...upon his title must show clearly the validity of his own title, and the invalidity of his opponent's title. Culbertson v. Montanbault, 133 So.2d 772, 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961). The record in this case demonstrates that appellants failed to establish the validity of the titles to McLemore's Tru......
  • Rushing v. Chappell, N--265
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 6, 1971
    ...plaintiff. The chancellor then quoted as his authority the following rule recognized by the Florida Supreme Court in Culbertson v. Montanbault, 133 So.2d 772 (Fla.App.1961): 'The law is clear that, he who comes into equity to get rid of a legal title as a cloud upon his own must show clearl......
  • Armstrong Cork Co. v. Crook, K-322
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 7, 1969
    ...55 Fla. 560, 46 So. 635 (1908). The elements of adverse possession must be proven by clear and positive proof. Culbertson v. Montanbault, 133 So.2d 772 (Fla.App.1961); Van Meter v. Kelsey, 91 So.2d 327 The rule with respect to directed verdicts in an ejectment action is not unlike that whic......
  • Flournoy v. Perkins
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 1995
    ...adverse possession under section 95.16 not shown by platting of property and payment of taxes thereon); Culbertson v. Montanbault, 133 So.2d 772, 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961) ("While evidence of the payment of taxes is admissible as one of the circumstances tending to determine the fact and exten......
1 books & journal articles
  • Real property actions
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Causes of Action
    • April 1, 2022
    ...own title. Source Van Loan v. Heather Hills Prop. Owners Assoc., Inc. , 216 So.3d 18, 23 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016); Culbertson v. Montanabault , 133 So.2d 772, 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961). §13:80.2.3 Elements of Cause of Action — 3rd DCA [No citation for this edition.] §13:80.2.4 Elements of Cause of A......