Cullough v. Smith

Decision Date03 December 1934
Docket NumberNo. 72,72
PartiesMcCULLOUGH v. SMITH
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Messrs. J. Howard McLain and John M. Robinson, both of Charlotte, N.C., for petitioner.

Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

While in the military service of the United States Moses Reid took out a war risk insurance policy for $10,000 and designated his father and mother as beneficiaries. He died intestate August 23, 1920, leaving no wife, child, or descendant. The father died November 22, 1926, intestate; the mother February 22, 1932. Her will designated an executrix.

No payment of any kind was made under the policy prior to the mother's death. Thereafter the Bureau of War Risk Insurance determined that during his life the insured became entitled to monthly disability payments aggregating $862.50 and caused this sum to be paid to his administrator. Also that while alive the father, as beneficiary, became entitled to installments aggregating $2,127.50 which was paid to his administrator. Further that during her life the mother, as beneficiary, became entitled to payments aggregating $3,938.75. This sum was paid to her executrix. Finally it ruled that the commuted value of unpaid monthly installments under the policy payable after the mother's death amounted to $5,768, and the assured's administrator collected this. The only funds received by him were from payments under the policy as above stated.

This proceeding, with proper parties, was duly begun by the assured's administrator in the superior court of Mecklenburg county, N.C. It sought binding direction concerning distribution of funds on hand and presented no other question.

The trial court ruled that at the soldier's death his father and mother became sole distributees of his estate; 'that as to the $862.50 which was due the insured prior to his death, it belongs to the estate of the father and the estate of the mother equally; that as to the $5,768 received by him (the administrator) as the commuted value of the unpaid portion of the policy after the death of the beneficiaries, it should be paid to the estate of the father and the estate of the mother respectively in such sums as are required to bring the said estates to an equal sum after the sums paid into each by the Bureau of War Risk Insurance, and the half of the $862.50 has been added together; the intention of this finding being to make the estate of the father and the estate of the mother exactly equal finally.'

Upon appeal the Supreme Court of North Carolina affirmed. It said (206 N.C. 102, 173 S.E. 49):

'Wehn Moses Reid died, his distributees were his father, Adolphus Reid, and his mother, Ida Reid. Both were living. The statute cast upon each one-half of the personal property of deceased. Thereupon the right of property to such one-half immediately vested. C.S. § 137, subd. 6.

'Neither received as beneficiary in the war risk insurance policy any installment from the government during his or her life. Therefore the whole fund in contemplation of law is now assets of the estate of the dead soldier, to be distributed immediately to the estates of his father and mother. The fact that one beneficiary lived longer than the other, and hence entitled to receive more money in installments from the government, has nothing to do with the right of property as distributee. The intestate law of this state pegged that right at the death of the soldier.'

In Singleton v. Cheek, 284 U.S. 493, 52 S.Ct. 257, 76 L.Ed. 419, 81 A.L.R. 923, where the circumstances were similar to those presented here, nothing was paid under the policy until after the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • State of Missouri v. Wells, et al.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 9, 1948
    ...States, 273 U.S. 702, 47 S. Ct. 90. Revich v. United States, 25 F. 2d 670. Schroeder v. United States, 39 F. 2d 225. McCullough v. Smith, 293 U.S. 228, 55 S. Ct. 157. White v. United States, 270 U.S. 175, 46 S. Ct. 274. Johnson v. United States, 102 F. 2d 729. Lopez v. United States, 82 F. ......
  • State ex rel. Koontz v. Wells
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • February 9, 1948
    ... ... 702, 47 S.Ct. 90. Revich v ... United States, 25 F.2d 670. Schroeder v. United ... States, 39 F.2d 225. McCullough v. Smith, 293 ... U.S. 228, 55 S.Ct. 157. White v. United States, 270 ... U.S. 175, 46 S.Ct. 274. Johnson v. United States, ... 102 F.2d 729. Lopez ... ...
  • United States v. Short
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • October 12, 1956
    ...express provisions in the 1924 Act for payment to the beneficiary's estate of installments accrued but unpaid, McCullough v. Smith, 1934, 293 U.S. 228, 55 S.Ct. 157, 79 L.Ed. 297, Singleton v. Cheek, 1932, 284 U.S. 493, 52 S.Ct. 257, 76 L.Ed. 419, and their omission in the 1940 Act, Congres......
  • Dumas v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • April 25, 1939
    ...during his lifetime and the policy matured because of that event and not because of insured's death. McCullough v. Smith, 293 U.S. 228, 230, 231, 55 S.Ct. 157, 79 L.Ed. 297; United States v. Tarrer, 5 Cir., 77 F.2d 423, 425. In the case last cited the court said: "Appellee seems to concede ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT