Culver v. Sparkman, 8 Div. 776.

Decision Date03 October 1933
Docket Number8 Div. 776.
Citation149 So. 877,25 Ala.App. 544
PartiesCULVER et al. v. SPARKMAN.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Appeal from Morgan County Court; W. T. Lowe, Judge.

Action in assumpsit by W. J. Sparkman against J. R. Culver, J. F Stewart, and R. W. Puckett. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

When judge of inferior court of Hartselle deducted his fees and constable's fees in cases where defendant was acquitted from fines paid in other cases, they were immediately due constable, and action brought before expiration of judge's term was not premature (Loc.Acts 1907, p. 819; Code 1923, § 3850).

Count 2 of the complaint is as follows:

"Plaintiff claims of the defendants, one hundred twenty-five and 20/100 ($125.20) dollars, with interest thereon from July 1st, 1931, for that, in the years 1930 and 1931, defendant J. R. Culver, was Judge of the Inferior Court of Hartselle, in Morgan County.

Alabama, and as such, during said time was in the actual performance of the duties of said office, under color of said office, and plaintiff was the legal constable of the precinct of Morgan County in which said court was located, and during said time was authorized to and was actually engaged as said constable in serving and executing the legal process issued from said court by defendant Culver, as Judge thereof, as is aforesaid; and plaintiff avers, that defendants, J. F. Stewart and R. W. Puckett, were at and during said time on the official bond of defendant, J. R. Culver, as Judge of said Inferior Court of Hartselle.

"Plaintiff further avers, that during said time a large number of criminal cases were finally disposed of in said court by the said judge, a list of said cases so disposed of being attached as 'Exhibit A' to the first count of this complaint, and by reference thereto made a part of this count of the complaint, and that plaintiff served and executed the legal process issued by defendant Culver as judge of said court in said causes, and by reason of the service and execution thereof by plaintiff he became entitled to the fees allowed by law to constables for said services. Plaintiff further avers, that in each of said causes the defendants therein were discharged, or found guilty, by the said J. R. Culver, as judge of said inferior court; and plaintiff further avers that a large number of criminal cases were tried and convicted by the said Culver as said judge of said court during said time, and that fines in each of said cases were collected, and were appropriated by said judge of said inferior court for the payment of the costs in the cases shown by 'Exhibit A' attached hereto; and plaintiff avers that his pro rata part of the costs collected as is aforesaid, in the cases shown by 'Exhibit A' hereto attached, amounted to said sum of $125.20; and plaintiff further avers that the fines in the cases where convictions were had, were collected by the defendant, J. R. Culver, acting as judge of said court, and under color of his office as said judge, and that under the law said fines so collected were appropriated by the defendant, as said judge to pay the costs in the cases in which no convictions had been had-as shown by 'Exhibit A' hereto attached; plaintiff further avers that after collecting the fines in cases convicted before him and after appropriating said fines so collected to the payment of the costs in the cases in which there had been no convictions-as shown by 'Exhibit A' hereto attached-it became the duty of defendant as judge of said inferior court to pay over to plaintiff his pro rata part of said fines so collected, sufficient to pay the plaintiff his pro rata part of the fees earned by him in the cases in which there had been no conviction, said cases being shown by 'Exhibit A' hereto attached. Plaintiff further avers, that the condition of defendant's official bond as judge of said inferior court, is as follows:

"'Now, therefore, if the said J. R. Culver shall well and faithfully discharge the duties of such office during the time he continues therein, or discharges any of the duties thereof, then the obligation to be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect;' and plaintiff avers that said bond was breached in this, that notwithstanding it was defendant J. R. Culver's duty to pay over to plaintiff his pro rata part of the fines collected and appropriated as is aforesaid to pay the fees earned by plaintiff in the cases in which the defendants were found not guilty or discharged, as shown by 'Exhibit A' hereto attached, that the said defendant has failed and refused so to do on plaintiff's request, and defendant now has said moneys so collected belonging to plaintiff in his custody or control, which he refuses to pay to plaintiff; wherefore plaintiff brings this suit."

The following are the grounds of demurrer interposed to count 2:

"1. Said complaint fails to state a cause of action. 2. Said complaint alleges a conclusion in these words: 'Plaintiff was the legal constable of the precinct of Morgan County, Alabama, in which said court was located.' 3. Said complaint fails to allege that W. J. Sparkman served or executed any legal process. 4. Said complaint fails to allege what legal process was served by him issued by defendant, J. R. Culver, as judge of said court. 5. Said complaint alleges a conclusion when it alleges 'and by reason of the service and execution thereof by plaintiff he became entitled to the fees allowed by law to constables for said services.' 6. Said complaint fails to allege that the services rendered by him was rendered in precinct 10 of Morgan County. 7. Said complaint fails to allege that the services rendered by the plaintiff was legal or criminal. 8. Said complaint alleges a conclusion in these words: 'Plaintiff further avers that after collecting said fees it became the duty of defendant as judge of said inferior court to pay over to the plaintiff the fees so collected.' 9. Said complaint fails to allege that the
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State, for Use and Ben. of Morgan County v. Norwood
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 11 d4 Abril d4 1946
    ...the justice out of the specific funds indicated and in his hands. In Sanders v. Young, 220 Ala. 94, 124 So. 225, and in Culver v. Sparkman, 25 Ala.App. 544, 149 So. 877, and in State v. Smith, 31 Ala.App. 533, 19 546, the statute was applied to compensation of the constable serving process ......
  • Sisson v. Pruitt
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 4 d2 Outubro d2 1938
    ...183 So. 686 28 Ala.App. 341 SISSON ET AL. v. PRUITT. 7 Div. 381.Court of Appeals of AlabamaOctober 4, 1938 ... 143, 93 So. 890; ... Culver et al. v. Sparkman, 25 Ala.App. 544, 149 So ... ...
  • Peppers v. Agee Mercantile Co., 8 Div. 678.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 3 d2 Outubro d2 1933

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT