Cummings v. Ortega

Docket Number417PA10
Decision Date07 October 2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • State v. Hobbs
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 1, 2020
    ...State v. Robinson , 336 N.C. 78, 93, 443 S.E.2d 306, 312 (1994), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Cummings v. Ortega , 365 N.C. 262, 716 S.E.2d 235 (2011) ).When a trial court asks for the State’s reasoning for using peremptory challenges after making a ruling that the de......
  • State v. Corbett
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 4, 2020
    ...stability and finality of verdicts, and protection of jurors against annoyance and embarrassment." Cummings v. Ortega , 365 N.C. 262, 267, 716 S.E.2d 235, 239 (2011), cert. denied , 566 U.S. 993, 132 S.Ct. 2384, 182 L. Ed. 2d 1029 (2012). This rule has been codified under N.C. Gen. Stat. § ......
  • State v. Blake
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 2020
    ...stability and finality of verdicts, and protection of jurors against annoyance and embarrassment.’ " (quoting Cummings v. Ortega , 365 N.C. 262, 267, 716 S.E.2d 235, 239 (2011) )).Based upon this structural error, where the jurors failed to follow the trial court's instructions to find Defe......
  • People v. Archuleta
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • April 15, 2021
    ...argument that evidence of juror misconduct before deliberations was not barred by Fed. R. Evid. 606(b) ); Cummings v. Ortega , 365 N.C. 262, 716 S.E.2d 235, 271 (2011) (applying Tanner and concluding juror affidavits that alleged a fellow juror pre-decided guilt and said his "mind was made ......
  • Get Started for Free