Cunningham v. California, 05-6551.
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Citation | 546 U.S. 1169 |
Docket Number | No. 05-6551.,05-6551. |
Parties | CUNNINGHAM <I>v.</I> CALIFORNIA. |
Decision Date | 21 February 2006 |
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial14 cases
-
In re Gomez
...199 P.3d 574 ... 88 Cal.Rptr.3d 177 ... 45 Cal. 4th 650 ... In re Sotero GOMEZ on Habeas Corpus ... No. S155425 ... Supreme Court of California ... February 2, 2009 ... [199 P.3d 575] ... Vincent James Oliver, Los Angeles, and Joseph Walsh, for Petitioner Sotero Gomez ... GEORGE, C.J ... This case presents the question whether Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. 270, 127 S.Ct. 856, 166 L.Ed.2d 856 (Cunningham) applies on collateral review of a judgment that became final before ... ...
- Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
- Cunningham v. California
-
Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
... ... GENENTECH, INC., et al., Defendants ... No. CV 03-2567 MRP (CTx) ... United States District Court, C.D. California ... February 7, 2008 ... Page 1001 ... COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ... Page 1002 ... Aaron P. Maurer, David C. Kiernan, ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Medimmune, Microsoft, and KSR: the United States Supreme Court in 2007 tips the balance in favor of innovation in patent cases, and thrice reverses the Federal Circuit.
...Opinions in Patent Interferences, 88 J. PAT & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC'Y. 305, 338-39 (2006). (40.) MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 546 U.S. 1169, 1169 (2006). See Kali N. Murray, Rules for Radicals: A Politics of Patent Law, 14 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 63, 79 (41.) U.S. CONST. art. III. (42.)......