Cunningham v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Town of Plainville
| Decision Date | 03 November 2005 |
| Citation | Cunningham v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Town of Plainville, 888 A.2d 83, 276 Conn. 915 (Conn. 2005) |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | William E. CUNNINGHAM et al. v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF PLAINVILLE et al. |
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn.App. 273, 876 A.2d 1257(2005), is denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
L. D. v. G. T.
...its separate parts in order to render a reasonable overall interpretation" (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 276 Conn. 915, 888 A.2d 83 (2005) ; by explicitly preserving a party's right to cross-examine witnesses outside of the courtroom, § 46b-15c implies that a party has ......
-
Lepkowski v. Plan. Comm'n
...quotation marks omitted.) Cunningham v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 90 Conn. App. 273, 283, 876 A.2d 1257, cert. denied, 276 Conn. 915, 888 A.2d 83 (2005). [17] "Our Supreme Court has observed that regulations must be interpreted in accordance with the principle that a reasonable and rati......
-
Anketell v. Kulldorff
...plan "[b]ecause the conservation plan was not in evidence before the trial court when it rendered its judgment"), cert. denied, 276 Conn. 915, 888 A.2d 83 (2005); DiBello v. Barnes Page Wire Products, Inc., 67 Conn. App. 361, 374–75, 786 A.2d 1234 (2001) ("[b]ecause the defendant’s claim is......
- Hayes v. Caspers, Ltd.