Cunningham v. State Plant Board of Florida
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; THOMAS |
| Citation | Cunningham v. State Plant Board of Florida, 115 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1959) |
| Decision Date | 18 November 1959 |
| Parties | James L. CUNNINGHAM and his wife, Helen M. Cunningham, Petitioners, v. STATE PLANT BOARD OF FLORIDA, and body corporate under the laws of the State of Florida, et al., Respondents. |
Appeal from District Court of Appeal, Second District.
Henry L. Jollay, Winter Haven, for petitioners.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., Ralph E. Odum and William J. Roberts, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondents.
This cause is before the court on petition for certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Cunningham v. State Plant Board of Florida, Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 905. We have carefully examined the petition, as supplemented by supporting briefs and argument of counsel at the Bar of this court, and have concluded that the District Court of Appeal disposed of the matter with a decision which fails to collide with a prior decision of this court on the same point of law.
The petition for the writ of certiorari is, accordingly, denied.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Von Stetina
...retrospective operation of statutes. Id. at 136 (citing Cunningham v. State Plant Board, 112 So.2d 905 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 115 So.2d 701 (Fla.1959)). We accept the Fund's view that the 1982 amendment to section 768.54 is remedial in nature. The amendment does not alter the size of ......
-
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. Bonanno
...been destroyed prior to the enactment of the statute. Cunningham v. State Plant Board, 112 So.2d 905 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 115 So.2d 701 (Fla.1959). The relevance of these decisions will become more apparent as the several constitutional attacks upon chapter 89-91 are The plaintiffs ......
-
Gordon v. John Deere Company
...such a statute is presumed to operate prospectively only. Cunningham v. State Plant Board, 112 So.2d 905 (Fla.App.1959), cert. den. 115 So.2d 701 (Fla.1959); Heberle v. P.R.O. Liquidating Co., 186 So. 2d 280 (Fla.App.1966); Meier v. Grimes, 202 So.2d 870 The "long arm" statutes in a number ......
-
Kawasaki of Tampa, Inc. v. Calvin
... ... No. DD-53 ... District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District ... May 3, 1977 ... As Corrected On ... the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, State of Florida, (hereafter referred to as the Director) ... against retrospective operation of statutes." Cunningham v. State Plant Board of Florida, Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d ... ...
Get Started for Free
