Cupit v. Grant
Decision Date | 14 May 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 85-494,85-494 |
Citation | 488 So.2d 358 |
Parties | Daniel CUPIT, Sr., et al, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Louis Neal GRANT, et al, Defendants-Appellees. 488 So.2d 358 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Broussard, Bolton & Halcomb, Roy S. Halcomb, Jr., Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.
Charles S. Norris, Jr., Jonesville, Davenport, Files & Kelly, Thomas W. Davenport, Jr., Monroe, for defendant-appellee.
Before DOMENGEAUX and YELVERTON, JJ., and JACKSON, J. Pro Tem. *
This appeal arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on June 21, 1976. A pick-up truck operated by Louis Neal Grant collided head-on with an automobile driven by Edward L. Youngblood. Two of the passengers in Youngblood's car were Terry Dale Cupit, a minor, and his mother, Charlotte Ann Buckles Youngblood. Terry Dale Cupit was injured and his mother killed. Daniel Cupit, Sr., individually and as provisional tutor of the three minor children, Daniel Cupit, Terry Dale Cupit and Sherry Gayle Cupit, filed suit. Recovery is sought for the general and specific damages sustained by Terry Dale and also for the wrongful death of the mother of the three minor Cupit Children.
Made defendants in this suit are Louis Neal Grant, Louisiana Delta Plantation, Morrison Grain Company, Inc. and Morrison-Quirk Grain Corporation. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Edward Youngblood, Sr. Louisiana Delta, Morrison Grain and Morrison-Quirk are alleged employers of Grant and/or engaged in a joint venture with Grant. Aetna was sued as the insurer of all the above defendants except for Edward Youngblood.
The case was initially tried in March, 1982 before a twelve (12) man jury. Morrison Grain Company, Inc., Morrison-Quirk Grain Corporation, Louisiana Delta Plantation and The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company were granted a directed verdict. The trial judge held that an employment relationship did not exist between these three defendants and Grant. The jury found Grant liable for plaintiffs' injuries and returned a verdict of $300,000.00 for the general damages suffered by Terry Dale Cupit and of $15,000.00 per child for the wrongful death of their mother. The parties stipulated to Terry Dale's medical damages.
Plaintiffs appealed the amount of the awards and the directed verdict. This Court ruled on December 22, 1982 that granting the directed verdict was error and increased the award of $15,000.00 per child to $30,000 for the wrongful death of their mother. Cupit v. Grant, et al, 425 So.2d 847 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1982).
The case was then remanded to the trial court for a new trial between plaintiffs and Louisiana Delta, Morrison Grain, Morrison-Quirk and Aetna as defendants. The trial court, by granting a Motion in Limine filed by defendants, restricted the new trial to the issues of insurance coverage and the legal relationship between defendants and Louis Neal Grant. Plaintiffs waived their right to trial by jury. The trial judge ruled in favor of defendants holding that the relationship between Grant and defendants, Louisiana Delta, Morrison Grain, and Morrison-Quirk, was one of lessee--lessor, not of employment. If there is no employment relationship, then the issue of insurance coverage is not reached. Judgment was signed January 25, 1985, which judgment is now appealed.
A personal injury suit was also brought by plaintiffs in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. Aetna Casualty was not named as defendant. In that action, defendants Morrison Grain and Morrison-Quirk, d/b/a Louisiana Delta Plantation, moved for Summary Judgment as to the employment relationship. That motion was granted, the Federal District Court finding that the relationship was one of lessor--lessee, not employer--employee. See Youngblood v. Morrison Grain Company, Inc., 467 F.Supp. 758 (1978). The Fifth Circuit upheld. Youngblood v. Morrison Grain Company, 591 F.2d 1207 (1979). An Exception of Res Judicata in the case at bar was denied on the basis that a named defendant in the State suit, Aetna Casualty, was not so named in the Federal action.
The issue here, therefore, is one encountered at least twice in prior judicial rulings. Was Grant at the time of the accident an employee of Morrison Grain Company and Morrison-Quirk Grain Corporation, d/b/a Louisiana Delta Plantation, so as to render these three defendants vicariously liable for the injuries suffered by plaintiffs? This Court finds that there was no such relationship.
In an excellent opinion Judge Tom Stagg of the United States Western District of Louisiana addressed the employment issue and ruled against plaintiffs in Youngblood, supra:
Is there a genuine issue as to any material fact?
It is agreed and understood that nothing contained herein shall have the effect of making lessee an agent or employee of Lessor and nothing herein shall be interpreted to permit Lessor to supervise either Lessee's employees, servants or Lessee in respect to the time and manner in which Lessee's machinery or labor is operated or their duties performed.'
Are defendants entitled to judgment as a matter of law?
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cupit v. Grant
...Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 85-494; Parish of Catahoula, 7th Judicial District Court, Div. "B", No. 12190. Prior report: La.App., 488 So.2d 358. Denied. The result is DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ. ...