Currier v. Silkey
| Decision Date | 07 December 1920 |
| Docket Number | No. 1706.,1706. |
| Citation | 112 A. 246 |
| Parties | CURRIER v. SILKEY. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Transferred, from Superior Court, Hillsborough County; Marble, Judge.
Action between Hiram B. Currier and Fred Silkey. Transferred upon an agreed statement of facts. Case discharged.
Holman & Smith, of Hillsborough, for plaintiff.
Nathaniel E. Martin, of Concord, for defendant.
The facts being considered insufficiently stated to raise the questions of law argued, the order was:
Case discharged.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Lamarre v. Lamarre
...74 N. H. 492, 69 A. 720; Rand v. Anderson, 74 N. H. 601, 67 A. 1102; Strafford County v. Dover, 74 N. H. 601, 68 A. 1116; Currier v. Silkey, 79 N. H. 534, 112 A. 246; Eaton v. Clarke, 80 N. H. 586, 119 A. 924; Spaulding v. Mayo, supra; Gianaris v. Mangurian, 82 N. H. 558, 133 A. Exceptions ......
- State v. Downes