Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc.
| Decision Date | 01 February 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-8447,92-8447 |
| Citation | 982 F.2d 472 |
| Parties | 62 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 867, 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,038 Janet CURTIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. METRO AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Clifford H. Nelson, Jr., James Larry Stine, Wimberly & Lawson, Atlanta, GA, for defendant-appellant.
Debra E. Schwartz, Stanford, Fagan & Giolito, Atlanta, GA, for plaintiff-appellee.
Michael Selmi, Sharon R. Vinick, Washington, DC, for Amicus--Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, CARNES, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Janet Curtis, a former employee of Metro Ambulance Service ("Metro") filed suit against Metro for allegedly retaliating against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and for intentional infliction of emotional distress in violation of Georgia state law. In her initial complaint she sought reinstatement and back pay as well as attorneys' fees and costs under Title VII. She also sought compensatory and punitive damages under state law and a jury trial of her state claim. The federal and state claims were severed for purposes of trial.
The Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub.L.No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071 ("the Act"), provides that Title VII plaintiffs may recover compensatory and punitive damages in addition to reinstatement and back pay. It also provides that Title VII plaintiffs requesting compensatory and punitive damages may seek a jury trial. The effective date of the Act is November 21, 1991. By that date in this case discovery had closed and a joint pretrial order had been filed, but no judgment had been entered. Curtis promptly filed a motion to amend the Title VII portion of her complaint in order to add a demand for a jury trial and a request for compensatory and punitive damages. The district court granted Curtis leave to amend and under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) certified for interlocutory appeal the issue of whether the Act should be applied retroactively to pending cases. We entered an order permitting the interlocutory appeal.
This case squarely presents the issue of whether provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 are retroactively applicable to a case which arose before the effective date of the Act but which had not resulted in final judgment as of that effective date. In Baynes v. AT & T Technologies, Inc., 976 F.2d 1370 (11th Cir.1992), another panel of this Court held that the compensatory and punitive damages and jury trial provisions of the Act were not retroactively applicable to cases in which a judgment had been entered before the Act's effective...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cohen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
..."the amendment made by section 110 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this act"). 4 Accord Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir.1993). 5 Accord Harvis v. Roadway Express, Inc., 973 F.2d 490 (6th Cir.1992), petition for cert. granted in part, Landgra......
-
Plaisance v. Travelers Ins. Co., Civ. A. No. 1:93-cv-1021-RLV.
...This view of Baynes has in fact been adopted by several panels of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. See, Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir.1993). See also, Goldsmith v. Atmore, 996 F.2d 1155, 1159 (11th Cir.1993); Vance v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 98......
-
Malone v. Chambers County Bd. of Com'rs
...of 1991 adds compensatory and punitive damages to the list of remedies that Title VII plaintiffs may seek. Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Serv., Inc., 982 F.2d 472, 473 (11th Cir.1993). It also provides that Title VII plaintiffs who request compensatory or punitive damages may try their case to ......
-
Walker v. NationsBank of Florida N.A.
...non-discriminatory reason for Walker's termination was pretextual. 4 Following this court's decision in Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Service, Inc., 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir.1993), holding that the Civil Rights Act of 1991 would not be applied retroactively, the district court denied Walker's mot......
-
Retroactivity of the Civil Rights Act of 1991
...6. 24. 966 F.2d 225 (7th Cir. 1992). 25. Supra, note 9. 26. 975 F.2d 886 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (on remand from the U.S. Supreme Court). 27. 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir. 1993). 28. Supra, note 8. 29. Supra, note 8. 30. 911 F.2d 1377 (10th Cir. 1990). 31. Supra, note 6. 32. 780 F.Supp. 1354 (D.Colo. 19......
-
Trial Practice and Procedure - Philip W. Savrin
...scattered sections of 42 U.S.C). See 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e (Supp. 1991). 166. 75 F.3d at 1517. 167. Curtis v. Metro Ambulance Serv., Inc., 982 F.2d 472 (11th Cir. 1993). 168. 75 F.3d at 1517. 169. Id. at 1520. 170. Id. 171. Id. at 1521-22. 172. 76 f.3d 347 (11th Cir. 1996). 173. Id. at 348. ......