Curtis v. Perini, 19235.
Citation | 413 F.2d 546 |
Decision Date | 20 June 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 19235.,19235. |
Parties | Raymond CURTIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. P. PERINI, Supt. Marion Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
Raymond Curtis, in pro. per.
Paul W. Brown, Atty. Gen., Leo J. Conway, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.
Before O'SULLIVAN and McCREE, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge.
This cause is before the Court upon an appeal by Raymond Curtis, petitioner-appellant, from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Upon consideration we find no merit to any of the claims for relief advanced by the appellant and we find that the district judge adequately considered each of appellant's claims and correctly determined that the petition should be dismissed.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Young reported at 301 F. Supp. 444.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bradshaw v. State of Oklahoma
... ... These allegations do not raise a federal constitutional question. Curtis v. Perini, 301 F.Supp. 444 (D.C.Ohio 1968), affd 6 Cir., 413 F. 2d 546. There is no federal ... ...
- Delawder v. Warden, Case No. 1:16-cv-743
-
Bermudez v. Reid
... ... The Sixth Circuit first addressed the question in Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134 (6th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 906, 91 S.Ct. 147, 27 L.Ed.2d 143, where it ... See, e.g., Mattox v. Scott, 507 F.2d 919, 924 (7th Cir.1974). See also Curtis" v. Perini, 301 F.Supp. 444, 445 (N.D.Ohio 1968), aff'd, 413 F.2d 546 (6th Cir.1969) ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Bennett v. Collins
...Attorney General and to refuse to consider the tardy return." Mattox v. Scott, 507 F.2d 919, 924 (7th Cir. 1974) (citing Curtis v. Perini, 413 F.2d 546 (6th Cir.1969)). The Fifth Circuit has similarly recognized that in certain instances, the district court may refuse to entertain a belated......