Curtiss v. Curtiss
| Docket Number | 20160064 |
| Decision Date | 17 October 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
16 cases
-
Rath v. Rath
...parenting time are findings of fact, subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. Williams , at ¶ 3 (citing Curtiss v. Curtiss , 2016 ND 197, ¶ 10, 886 N.W.2d 565 ). Whether to grant a new trial motion rests entirely within the court's discretion. Jalbert , 2017 ND 50, ¶ 7, 891 N.W.......
-
Rath v. Rath
...the evidentiary and legal basis for its decision, allowing the parties and this Court to understand the decision." Curtiss v. Curtiss , 2016 ND 197, ¶ 13, 886 N.W.2d 565 (quoting Estate of Nelson , 2015 ND 122, ¶ 13, 863 N.W.2d 521 ). "The court’s findings are sufficient if they afford a cl......
-
Jackson v. Narvais (In re L.Z.N.)
...at a civil proceeding is limited." Id. at ¶ 8, (quoting Norman v. Leingang , 521 N.W.2d 395, 397 (N.D. 1994) ); Curtiss v. Curtiss , 2016 ND 197, ¶ 8, 886 N.W.2d 565. One way a prisoner's right to appear can be satisfied is by allowing his or her appearance via telephone. St. Claire v. St. ......
-
Gomm v. Winterfeldt
...at a minimum, necessitates notice and a meaningful opportunity for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case." Curtiss v. Curtiss , 2016 ND 197, ¶ 8, 886 N.W.2d 565 (quoting St. Claire v. St. Claire , 2004 ND 39, ¶ 6, 675 N.W.2d 175 ); see also In re G.R.H. , 2006 ND 56, ¶ 24, 711 N.W......
Get Started for Free