D'Agostino v. Baker
| Decision Date | 13 June 2016 |
| Docket Number | No. 15–1347.,15–1347. |
| Parties | Kathleen D'AGOSTINO, et al., petitioners, v. Charlie BAKER, Governor of Massachusetts, et al. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Motion of Cato Institute for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Branch v. Commonwealth Emp't Relations Bd., SJC-12603
...non-union members of the bargaining unit." D'Agostino v. Baker, 812 F.3d 240, 244 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2473, 195 L.Ed.2d 812 (2016).Moreover, as discussed, conflicting representatives in collective bargaining is not practicable: to have the employee representat......
-
Hill v. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union
...representatives. D'Agostino v. Baker , 812 F.3d 240, 244 (1st Cir.) (Souter, J., by designation), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2473, 195 L.Ed.2d 812 (2016) ("What Harris did not speak to, however, was the premise assumed and extended in Knight : that exclusive bargaining represen......
-
Reisman v. Associated Faculties of the Univ. of Me., 1:18-cv-00307-JDL
...on grounds similar to those Reisman asserts, and D'Agostino v. Baker , 812 F.3d 240 (1st Cir. 2016), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2473, 195 L.Ed.2d 812 (2016), which similarly rejected a challenge to the exclusive representation provisions of a Massachusetts collective bargaining......