D'Antignac v. State, No. 31580
| Court | Supreme Court of Georgia |
| Writing for the Court | GUNTER |
| Citation | 238 Ga. 437,233 S.E.2d 206 |
| Decision Date | 02 March 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 31580 |
| Parties | Donald Emmett D'ANTIGNAC, II v. The STATE. |
Page 206
v.
The STATE.
[238 Ga. 439] Saul, Blount & Avrett, Percy J. Blount, Augusta, for appellant.
Richard E. Allen, Dist. Atty., Augusta, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Daryl A. Robinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.
[238 Ga. 437] GUNTER, Justice.
The appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He has come here for review.
Appellant was charged with the murder of David Dunn on the night of December 26, 1974. Evidence produced at the trial showed that the appellant and an accomplice, Taylor, drove with the victim to a deserted area of Richmond County, and there the appellant levelled a sawed-off shotgun at Dunn and fired at point-blank range killing him. An autopsy performed on the body of the victim revealed that probable cause of the death was three shotgun wounds.
The body of the victim was discovered at 11:15 p. m. on the same evening by two patrolling deputies of the Richmond County Sheriff's Department. The officers discovered Dunn's body lying on the ground near his deserted car. One of the officers testified
Page 207
that there were two sets of footprints, one of which led up to the body. There was a large amount of blood in the car and on the ground.After an interview with the victim's wife, the officers learned that Dunn was last seen leaving the house with the appellant and Taylor earlier in the evening. The officers went to Taylor's house and then to the appellant's who lived next door. Appellant's car was parked outside under a street light. Looking into the car, the officer was able to see the breech of a shotgun, a .38 caliber pistol, and a pair of black gloves. The officers went into the [238 Ga. 438] appellant's house to talk with him and ask his permission to look into the car. Appellant agreed and the officer accompanied him to his bedroom to find the car keys. Unable to find the keys, the appellant agreed to let the officer use a coat hanger to open the car. Appellant got the coat hanger and as the two were leaving to go outside, the officer saw a pair of black Converse All-Star tennis shoes lying in the appellant's bedroom next to a chair. On the left toe was a reddish-brown stain that appeared to be blood. Appellant was placed under arrest and advised of his rights.
Taylor, a party to the crime who had been granted immunity by the State, testified that he had agreed...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Jells, No. 89-1187
...320 S.E.2d 315, affirmed (1986), 316 N.C. 187, 340 S.E.2d 110; White v. State (Fla.App.1979), 375 So.2d 622; D'Antignac v. State (1977), 238 Ga. 437, 233 S.E.2d 206; People v. Lomas (1981), 92 Ill.App.3d 957, 48 Ill.Dec. 377, 416 N.E.2d 408; State v. Haarala (La.1981), 398 So.2d 1093; State......
-
People v. Vigil, Court of Appeals No. 12CA0015
...112 Cal.App.4th 1604, 6 Cal.Rptr.3d 155, 158 (2003) ; White v. State, 375 So.2d 622, 623 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1979) ; D'Antignac v. State, 238 Ga. 437, 233 S.E.2d 206, 207 (Ga.1977) ; People v. Lomas, 92 Ill.App.3d 957, 48 Ill.Dec. 377, 416 N.E.2d 408, 410 (1981) ; State v. Norris, 244 Kan. 326......
-
Hutt v. State, No. 964
...will suffice. See State v. Walker, 319 N.W.2d 414 (Minn.1982); State v. Jackson, 302 N.C. 101, 273 S.E.2d 666 (1981); D'Antignac v. State, 238 Ga. 437, 233 S.E.2d 206 (1977); Johnson v. State, 177 Ind.App. 501, 380 N.E.2d 566 (1978); State v. Drake, 298 S.W.2d 374 (Mo.1957); State v. Cullen......
-
Welch v. Commonwealth, 2017-SC-000528-MR
...the actual observations of individuals who could see detail and scale in person, instead of through photographs. See D'Antignac v. State, 238 Ga. 437, 233 S.E.2d 206, 207 (1977) (no error in officer giving lay opinion testimony comparing defendant’s tennis shoe and footprints found at crime......
-
State v. Jells, No. 89-1187
...320 S.E.2d 315, affirmed (1986), 316 N.C. 187, 340 S.E.2d 110; White v. State (Fla.App.1979), 375 So.2d 622; D'Antignac v. State (1977), 238 Ga. 437, 233 S.E.2d 206; People v. Lomas (1981), 92 Ill.App.3d 957, 48 Ill.Dec. 377, 416 N.E.2d 408; State v. Haarala (La.1981), 398 So.2d 1093; State......
-
People v. Vigil, Court of Appeals No. 12CA0015
...112 Cal.App.4th 1604, 6 Cal.Rptr.3d 155, 158 (2003) ; White v. State, 375 So.2d 622, 623 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1979) ; D'Antignac v. State, 238 Ga. 437, 233 S.E.2d 206, 207 (Ga.1977) ; People v. Lomas, 92 Ill.App.3d 957, 48 Ill.Dec. 377, 416 N.E.2d 408, 410 (1981) ; State v. Norris, 244 Kan. 326......
-
Hutt v. State, No. 964
...will suffice. See State v. Walker, 319 N.W.2d 414 (Minn.1982); State v. Jackson, 302 N.C. 101, 273 S.E.2d 666 (1981); D'Antignac v. State, 238 Ga. 437, 233 S.E.2d 206 (1977); Johnson v. State, 177 Ind.App. 501, 380 N.E.2d 566 (1978); State v. Drake, 298 S.W.2d 374 (Mo.1957); State v. Cullen......
-
Welch v. Commonwealth, 2017-SC-000528-MR
...the actual observations of individuals who could see detail and scale in person, instead of through photographs. See D'Antignac v. State, 238 Ga. 437, 233 S.E.2d 206, 207 (1977) (no error in officer giving lay opinion testimony comparing defendant’s tennis shoe and footprints found at crime......