D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio

• Court: New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM
• Citation: D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio, 365 A.2d 716, 144 N.J.Super. 352 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1976)
• Decision Date: 14 October 1976
• Parties: Dominick A. D'ONOFRIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Phyllis D'ONOFRIO, Defendant-Respondent.

Page 352

144 N.J.Super. 352

365 A.2d 716

Dominick A. D'ONOFRIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Phyllis D'ONOFRIO, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued Oct. 6, 1976.

Decided Oct. 14, 1976.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, whose opinion is published in 144 N.J.Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27.

LeRoy D. Safro, Union City, for for plaintiff-appellant.

George D. Rosenthal, Paterson, for defendant-respondent (Rosenthal & Rubinowitz, Paterson, attorneys; Jerome L. Rubinowitz, Paterson, on the brief).

Before Judges LORA, CRANE and MICHELS.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Pressler, 144 N.J.Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27 (Ch.Div.1976).