D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio

Decision Date14 October 1976
Citation365 A.2d 716,144 N.J.Super. 352
PartiesDominick A. D'ONOFRIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Phyllis D'ONOFRIO, Defendant-Respondent.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, whose opinion is published in 144 N.J.Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27.

LeRoy D. Safro, Union City, for for plaintiff-appellant.

George D. Rosenthal, Paterson, for defendant-respondent (Rosenthal & Rubinowitz, Paterson, attorneys; Jerome L. Rubinowitz, Paterson, on the brief).

Before Judges LORA, CRANE and MICHELS.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Pressler, 144 N.J.Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27 (Ch.Div.1976).

To continue reading

Request your trial
60 cases
  • Winer v. Winer
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • June 7, 1990
    ...of a custodial parent is proper. See D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio, 144 N.J.Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27 (Ch.Div.), aff'd, 144 N.J.Super. 352, 365 A.2d 716 (App.Div.1976); Cooper v. Cooper, 99 N.J. 42, 491 A.2d 606 (1984); Holder, 111 N.J. 344, 544 A.2d 852 (1988) (given in order of historical developm......
  • Stout v. Stout
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • April 1, 1997
    ...ago in the oft-cited case of D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio, 144 N.J.Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27 (Ch.Div.1976), aff'd per curiam 144 N.J.Super. 352, 365 A.2d 716 (App.Div.1976). 3 In its decision, the Superior Court listed the following factors for courts to consider in making a determination whether t......
  • Ireland v. Ireland
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • August 18, 1998
    ...certain criteria set forth in the widely cited case of D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio, 144 N.J.Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27, aff'd, 144 N.J.Super. 352, 365 A.2d 716 (App.Div.1976), for determining the best interests of the child in future postjudgment relocation cases. 1 Although the D'Onofrio criteria ......
  • Jaramillo v. Jaramillo
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • December 24, 1991
    ...27, 30 (Ch.Div.) ("real advantage" to custodial parent and child must be shown to justify removal), aff'd per curiam, 144 N.J.Super. 352, 365 A.2d 716 (App.Div.1976); Weiss v. Weiss, 52 N.Y.2d 170, 175-76, 418 N.E.2d 377, 380-81, 436 N.Y.S.2d 862, 865-66 (1981) ("exceptional circumstances" ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • 1998 Developments in Connecticut Family Law
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 73, 1998
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Presutti, 181 Conn. 622 (1980); and Simons v. Simons, 172 Conn. 341 (1977). 56 45 Conn. App. 423 (1997). 57 144 NJ. Super. 352, 365 A.2d 716 (App. Div.) affg 144 NJ. Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27 (1976). 58 246 Conn. at 432. 59 87 N.Y2d 727, 665 N.E.2d 145, 642 N.YS.2d 575 (1996). 60 246 Conn.......
  • 1997 Developments in Connecticut Family Law
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 72, 1997
    • Invalid date
    ...in findings of contempt. 44 Conn. App. at 305, n. 2. 107. 45 Conn. App. 423, cert. granted, 243 Conn. 905 (1997). 108. 144 NJ. Super. 352, 365 A.2d 716 (App. Div.) aft 144 Super. 200, 365 A.2d 27 (1976). 109. 45 Conn. App at 427-28 citing D'Onofrio 144 N.J. Super at 206. 110. Id. at 427-29.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT