D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Exp., Inc., No. 83-1844

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, BREYER; GIERBOLINI
Citation736 F.2d 1
PartiesD.P. APPAREL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., Defendant, Appellee.
Docket NumberNo. 83-1844
Decision Date31 May 1984
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 practice notes
  • Ameriswiss Tech., LLC v. Midway Line of Ill., Inc., Civil No. 11–cv–148–LM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of New Hampshire
    • 27 Septiembre 2012
    ...Pac. R.R. Co. v. Elmore & Stahl, 377 U.S. 134, 137–38, 84 S.Ct. 1142, 12 L.Ed.2d 194 (1964); D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 736 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1984)). “If [a] plaintiff succeeds in establishing [a prima facie case], ‘the burden of proof is upon the carrier to show both tha......
  • Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., Nos. 89-1690
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • 6 Noviembre 1989
    ...instances where the defaulting party's misconduct is correspondingly egregious. Id.; see also D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 736 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1984); Corchado v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc., 665 F.2d 410, 413 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826, 103 S.Ct. 6......
  • In re Barrow, Bankruptcy No. 81-01371-A
    • United States
    • Bankr. V.I.
    • 13 Junio 1988
    ...zealously. Lester v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 217 F.2d 399, 400 (9th Cir.1954); see D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Express Inc., 736 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1984) (involuntary dismissals under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) should be granted sparingly); Joe Powell & Assoc., Inc. v. International Tel.......
  • Roadway Exp., Inc. v. Fuente Cigar, Ltd., No. 87-1423-CIV-RYSKAMP.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 5 Octubre 1990
    ...Roadway's Rule 41(b) motion must be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard. See, e.g., D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 736 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1984). Furthermore, the trial court's findings of fact must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. See, e.g., Thousand Springs Tr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
28 cases
  • Ameriswiss Tech., LLC v. Midway Line of Ill., Inc., Civil No. 11–cv–148–LM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of New Hampshire
    • 27 Septiembre 2012
    ...Pac. R.R. Co. v. Elmore & Stahl, 377 U.S. 134, 137–38, 84 S.Ct. 1142, 12 L.Ed.2d 194 (1964); D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 736 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1984)). “If [a] plaintiff succeeds in establishing [a prima facie case], ‘the burden of proof is upon the carrier to show both tha......
  • Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., Nos. 89-1690
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • 6 Noviembre 1989
    ...instances where the defaulting party's misconduct is correspondingly egregious. Id.; see also D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 736 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1984); Corchado v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc., 665 F.2d 410, 413 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826, 103 S.Ct. 6......
  • In re Barrow, Bankruptcy No. 81-01371-A
    • United States
    • Bankr. V.I.
    • 13 Junio 1988
    ...zealously. Lester v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 217 F.2d 399, 400 (9th Cir.1954); see D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Express Inc., 736 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1984) (involuntary dismissals under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) should be granted sparingly); Joe Powell & Assoc., Inc. v. International Tel.......
  • Roadway Exp., Inc. v. Fuente Cigar, Ltd., No. 87-1423-CIV-RYSKAMP.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 5 Octubre 1990
    ...Roadway's Rule 41(b) motion must be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard. See, e.g., D.P. Apparel Corp. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 736 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1984). Furthermore, the trial court's findings of fact must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. See, e.g., Thousand Springs Tr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT