Daegele v. Kansas, 72

Decision Date14 October 1963
Docket NumberM,No. 72,72
Citation375 U.S. 1,84 S.Ct. 89,11 L.Ed.2d 44
PartiesGeorge Wm. DAEGELE v. KANSAS. isc
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

George Wm. Daegele, pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen. of Kan., and J. Richard Foth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811.

For reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in No. 16, Misc., Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, and related cases, 375 U.S. 2, 84 S.Ct. p. 80, Mr. Justice HARLAN would set this case for argument of the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811, should be applied retroactively.

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • People v. Chrisman
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 28 Noviembre 1967
    ... ... (Citations.)' (People v. Candalaria (1953) 121 Cal.App.2d 686, 689, 264 P.2d 71, 72; and see People v. [256 Cal.App.2d 432] Winston (1956) 46 Cal.2d 151, 155, 293 P.2d 40; People v ... ...
  • Barnes v. State
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 6 Diciembre 1969
    ...1039, in a per curiam opinion. The retrospective application of Douglas v. California, supra, is also affirmed by Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 44, which reversed the Kansas Supreme Court without an opinion, citing the Douglas case. For other federal decisions touch......
  • Donnell v. Swenson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • 4 Octubre 1966
    ...584, 84 S.Ct. 1929, 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964); Shockey v. Illinois, 375 U.S. 22, 84 S.Ct. 83, 11 L.Ed.2d 43 (1963); Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 44 (1963). This is a strong indication that Douglas v. People of State of California is to be given retrospective effect. T......
  • Simmons v. Kapture
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 26 Enero 2007
    ...or "bedrock procedural elements." The right to counsel has historically been applied retroactively, such as in Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 44 (1963), which retroactively applied Douglas, and Arsenault v. Massachusetts, 393 U.S. 5, 89 S.Ct. 35, 21 L.Ed.2d 5 (1968),......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT