Daley v. Liquor Control Commission
| Decision Date | 26 February 1974 |
| Citation | 166 Conn. 97,347 A.2d 69 |
| Parties | William J. DALEY et al. v. LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION et al. |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Herbert L. Emanuelson, Jr., New Haven, with whom was David T. Totman, New Haven, for appellants-appellees (plaintiffs).
Kathryn Emmett, Bridgeport, for appellees-appellants (defendant remonstrants Avery et al.).
Richard M. Sheridan, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom, on the brief, was Robert K. Killian, Atty. Gen., for appellee-appellant (named defendant).
Before HOUSE, C.J., and COTTER, SHAPIRO, LOISELLE and BOGDANSKI, JJ.
The plaintiff, The Mory's Association, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Mory's, brought this appeal from the revocation of its club liquor permit by the defendant liquor control commission of the state of Connecticut. The remaining defendants, who are residents of New Haven, Connecticut, were remonstrants in the proceedings before the liquor control commission and were added as defendants by Mory's by an amendment to its writ and complaint.
The trial court made no finding and, consequently, we resort to the memorandum of decision in order to learn the basis for the court's decision on the merits of the appeal. Hughes v. Town Planning & Zoning Commission, 156 Conn. 505, 506, 242 A.2d 705; Wooster v. Wm. C.A. Fischer Plumbing & Heating Co., 153 Conn. 700, 701, 220 A.2d 449. Mory's, which is located in New Haven, Connecticut, near the Yale University campus, was incorporated in 1912 without capital stock by thirty-five men for the stated purpose of the promotion of social intercourse and the culture of its members. On June 9, 1939, Mory's adopted bylaws which provided, inter alia, that the president, vice-president and a board of governors, consisting of twelve members, were to be elected at the annual meeting of the members to be held in February of each year. The bylaws did not specifically designate who were eligible to become members of Mory's Due in part to the increased cost of mailing notices to a membership in excess of 18,000, Mory's sought a legislative change in its articles of association, and the 1969 session of the General Assembly enacted Special Act No. 72 by which the articles of association were amended to provide that the members would not be entitled to vote on any matter, and that Mory's would operate under the management of a board of governors which would be self-perpetuating. Special Act No. 72 further provided that it would become valid as an amendment to Mory's articles of association if, within six months after its passage, it was accepted by a two-thirds vote of the members of Mory's board of governors. In September, 1969, the board of governors of Mory's by a two-thirds vote, accepted the provisions of Special Act No. 72 and adopted certain bylaws, one of which limited eligibility for membership exclusively to males. 1
On January 27, 1972, the liquor control commission, after a public hearing, revoked the club liquor permit for Mory's, stating as the reasons therefor (1) that Mory's was not and did not in fact operate as a club within the purview of the Liquor Control Act, General Statutes § 30-1(7), and (2) that it operated a club liquor business in a discriminatory manner, in that women are denied the use of the permit premises. Mory's appealed to the Court of Common Pleas which held that the commission erred in its finding of discrimination but otherwise sustained the commission's findings.
On the appeal to this court, Mory's has assigned as error the court's conclusion that it did not operate as a club within the meaning of § 30-1(7) of the General Statutes. The defendants in their cross appeal have assigned as error that the court erred in failing to find that Mory's operated its club liquor business in a discriminatory manner. We find that a decision on the merits of the plaintiffs' assignment of error is determinative of the appeal.
The portion of the Liquor Control Act, General Statutes § 30-1(7), relevant to this appeal provides as follows: "Club' means an association of persons, whether incorporated or unincorporated, which has been in existence as a bona fide organization for at least three years prior to applying for a permit issued as provided by this chapter . . . and provided, further, its affairs and management shall be conducted by a board of directors, executive committee or similar body chosen by the members at their annual meeting.' It is undisputed that upon passage of Special Act No. 72 and its approval by Mory's board of governors on ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R.A. Civitello Co. v. City of New Haven, 3310
..." (Citations omitted.) Waterbury Teachers Assn. v. Furlong, 162 Conn. 390, 404-405, 294 A.2d 546 (1972); Daley v. Liquor Control Commission, 166 Conn. 97, 101, 347 A.2d 69 (1974). State ex rel. Kennedy v. Frauwirth, 167 Conn. 165, 168, 355 A.2d 39 (1974); State v. Grant. 176 Conn. 17, 20, 4......
-
State v. Carbone
...144 Conn. 694, 702, 137 A.2d 536." Waterbury Teachers Assn. v. Furlong, 162 Conn. 390, 404, 294 A.2d 546, 554; Daley v. Liquor Control Commission, 166 Conn. 97, 101, 347 A.2d 69; 73 Am.Jur.2d, Statutes, § 393. There was no error in the court's denial of the pleas in James Carbone assigns er......
-
PLAZA MOBILE AND MODULAR HOMES v. Town of Colchester
...extending to Connecticut's municipalities the power to regulate and prohibit mobile home parks. See also, Daley v. Liquor Control Commission, 166 Conn. 97, 101, 347 A.2d 69 (1975) (a court will not repeal or limit one statute by implication if two statutes in question can be read together c......
-
State ex rel. Kennedy v. Frauwirth
...694, 702, 137 A.2d 536, 540.' Waterbury Teachers Assn. v. Furlong, 162 Conn. 390, 404-405, 294 A.2d 546, 554; Daley v. Liquor Control Commission, 166 Conn. 97, 101, 347 A.2d 69. The intent that the commission be politically balanced was clearly expressed in the 1935 special act and was modi......