Dangovich v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., 267
| Decision Date | 03 February 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 267,Docket 28302.,267 |
| Parties | Michael DANGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ISTHMIAN LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Donald D. Olman, New York City (Jacob Rassner, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert P. Hart, New York City (Kirlin, Campbell & Keating and Ralph C. Kreimer, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Michael Dangovich appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which dismissed his complaint brought against Isthmian Lines, Inc. under the provisions of the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, in which he sought to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as the result of the defendant's negligence. Finding no error in the decision of the district court, we affirm that court's judgment.
The facts are essentially undisputed. Dangovich was employed as an oiler aboard Isthmian's vessel S.S. Steel Seafarer. On November 24, 1960, while the vessel was moored in Khorramshahr, Iran, Dangovich desired to go ashore to a seamen's club. Never having been in Khorramshahr previously, he sought advice from his colleagues as to the quickest route to the town. One crew member advised him to take a railroad trestle quite near the boat. Although the actions of the third mate, an officer of the vessel, are left somewhat unclear by the testimony, at most the third mate concurred in this advice and indicated the bridge, stating "There it is."
At about 5:30 P.M. Dangovich went ashore, traversing the railroad trestle. After several hours in Khorramshahr and the neighboring town of Abadan, he returned via a taxi, which left him a short distance from the trestle. After proceeding some 35 feet along the catwalk which led to the trestle, Dangovich stepped on some pebbles and fell off the catwalk into a ravine below. The trial judge found that the catwalk was narrow and unguarded.
The appellant predicates his claim on the proposition that an officer of the vessel, the third mate, in the course of his employment instructed the appellant negligently as to a means of egress from the ship and that in consequence the negligence of the mate is attributable to the owners of the vessel.
We find it unnecessary to decide whether the acts of the third mate are attributable to the defendant,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dixon v. Grace Lines, Inc.
...Lines Co., 227 F.Supp. 180, 181 (S.D.N.Y.1964); Dangovich v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., 218 F.Supp. 235, 236 (S.D.N.Y.1963), aff'd 327 F.2d 355 (2nd Cir. 1964).) However, in the instant case plaintiff already had reached the native dock and was attempting to board a native boat which would take ......
-
Szopko v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co., Docket No. 74646
...Transport Lines, Inc., 369 F.Supp. 103 (E.D.Tex., 1974); Dangovich v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., 218 F.Supp. 235 (S.D.N.Y., 1963), aff'd 327 F.2d 355 (C.A.2, 1964); Ugarte v. United States Lines, Inc., 64 N.Y.2d 836, 486 N.Y.S.2d 934, 476 N.E.2d 333 (1985); Allan v. Brown & Root, Inc., 491 F.Sup......
-
Hamilton v. MARINE CARRIERS CORPORATION
...right of control." Other courts, particularly in the Second Circuit have followed this view. Most recently, in Dangovich v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., 327 F.2d 355 (2nd Cir. 1964), aff'g 218 F.Supp. 235 (S.D.N.Y. 1963) the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court opinion which denied relief under t......
-
Sullivan v. Ajax Navigation Corp.
...so apparent as to obviate defendant's duty to warn. See Dangovich v. Isthmian Lines Inc., 218 F.Supp. 235, 238 (S.D.N.Y.1963), aff'd, 327 F.2d 355 (1964). The plaintiff's expert on maritime matters, Neil Gallagher, stated that the risk of the parting mooring lines should have been apparent ......