Daniel v. Commissioner of Correction
Decision Date | 16 May 2000 |
Docket Number | (AC 18250) |
Citation | 57 Conn. App. 651,751 A.2d 398 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | RONALD LEE DANIEL v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION |
Foti, Mihalakos and Healey, JS. Adele V. Patterson, deputy assistant public defender, with whom was Temmy Ann Pieszak, assistant public defender, for the appellant (petitioner).
Carolyn K. Longstreth, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Patricia A. Swords, state's attorney, and John Dropick, former assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (respondent).
The petitioner, Ronald Lee Daniel, has taken this appeal from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he made four claims challenging the legality of his confinement. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court acted improperly (1) in finding that the record established that his plea of guilty was knowing, intelligent and voluntary,1 (2) in rejecting his claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in the underlying criminal proceeding, and (3) in rejecting his claim that the trial court and the trial court clerk deprived him of his right to appeal.2 We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The petitioner was arrested in March, 1988, and charged under General Statutes § 53a-54a with the March 19, 1988 murder of Marcel Malcolm. Attorney Michael A. Peck was retained on March 20, 1988, to represent him. On May 27, 1988, the petitioner was scheduled for a probable cause hearing on the murder charge. On that date, Peck informed the court that the probable cause hearing was being waived and requested the court to make a finding of probable cause preliminary to the petitioner's entering a plea to the murder charge. After the court, Kline, J., inquired of the petitioner concerning Peck's statement, the court made a finding that probable cause existed to prosecute the petitioner for murder under § 53a-54a. On May 27, 1988, the petitioner entered a plea of not guilty to the charge of murder and elected a jury trial. On July 14, 1989, however, the petitioner entered a plea of guilty, and, following a plea canvass, the trial court, Norko, J., accepted his guilty plea and made a finding of guilty. The petitioner's guilty plea was entered pursuant to an agreement that assistant state's attorney Warren Maxwell would recommend a sentence of forty years. At the time of his plea, the petitioner, upon inquiry of the court, stated that he felt Peck had been effective in representing his interests and that he knew of no reason why the court should not accept his plea. On August 31, 1989, the court imposed a total effective sentence of forty years.
We first take up the claim that the habeas court acted improperly in finding that the petitioner's plea canvass was adequate to demonstrate a knowing, intelligent and voluntary guilty plea.3 On appeal, the petitioner objects to the trial court's (1) dismissing as "insignificant" his objection to certain of the facts proffered by the prosecutor at the time of the plea, (2) statement that "the only thing that mattered, [was] the `gravamen' of the offense [which was] the act of pulling the trigger" and (3) failure to advise him of the intent element of the crime of murder under § 53a-54a.
Oppel v. Lopes, 200 Conn. 553, 556, 512 A.2d 888 (1986). A guilty plea may satisfy constitutional requirements even in the absence of literal compliance with the prophylactic safeguards of Practice Book §§ 31-19 and 31-20, respectively. State v. Badgett, 200 Conn. 412, 418, 512 A.2d 160, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940, 107 S. Ct. 423, 93 L. Ed. 2d 373 (1986); State v. Alicea, 41 Conn. App. 47, 55, 674 A.2d 468 (1996). State v. Garvin, 242 Conn. 296, 310, 699 A.2d 921 (1997).
We do not agree that at the time of taking4 the petitioner's guilty plea, the trial court dismissed as "insignificant" his objection to certain facts proffered by the prosecutor. When the prosecutor presented the factual basis for the plea, he recited the following:
Upon inquiry by the trial court, the prosecutor also informed the court that the $400 debt referred to arose out of an ongoing arrangement whereby the petitioner would sell drugs for the victim, and the petitioner failed to remit $400 to the victim. At that time, the prosecutor also informed the court that Osborne and the passenger in the Nissan were available to testify against the petitioner, but that Grant was unavailable because criminal charges were pending against him arising from the same incident.5
At that point, the trial court made the following inquiries of the defendant and received the following responses:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Irala
...review by this court unfettered by the clearly erroneous standard." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Daniel v. Commissioner of Correction, 57 Conn. App. 651, 663, 751 A.2d 398, cert. denied, 254 Conn. 918, 759 A.2d 1024 (2000). "[W]here the legal conclusions of the court are challenged, ......
-
State v. Grasso
...does not encompass a preemptive strike." State v. Lewis , 220 Conn. 602, 620, 600 A.2d 1330 (1991) ; Daniel v. Commissioner of Correction , 57 Conn. App. 651, 676, 751 A.2d 398 (same), cert. denied, 254 Conn. 918, 759 A.2d 1024 (2000). "The actor should not be permitted to use force when su......
-
Kendall v. Comm'r of Corr.
...the evidence must be relevant to those issues." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Daniel v. Commissioner of Correction, 57 Conn.App. 651, 654 n. 3, 751 A.2d 398, cert. denied, 254 Conn. 918, 759 A.2d 1024 (2000). "A habeas corpus action, as a variant of civil actions, i......
-
Jordan v. Comm'r of Corr.
...third-party culpability claim deficient performance), cert. denied, 282 Conn. 905, 920 A.2d 308 (2007) ; Daniel v. Commissioner of Correction , 57 Conn. App. 651, 684, 751 A.2d 398 (failure to raise third-party culpability defense did not constitute deficient performance because inconsisten......