Daniel v. Moats
Decision Date | 16 October 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 97-2911,97-2911 |
Citation | 718 So.2d 949 |
Parties | 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2333 Craig DANIEL, Appellant, v. Judy Black MOATS, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Remer Craig Daniel, Kennesaw, Georgia, Pro se.
Ann Melinda Craggs and M. Thomas Bond, of Bond, Arnett & Phelan, P.A., Ocala, for Appellee.
This is an appeal from an order modifying a Final Judgment of Paternity. We reverse.
While the parties were in high school in Georgia, the mother became pregnant by Craig Daniel. The child was born in Florida. A Marion County Court determined Craig Daniel to be the father and ordered him to pay $160 a month child support. The father graduated from Georgia Tech with a degree in Science of Building Construction and, although his career goal was in construction, obtained a law degree. His loans for his education at this point exceeded $90,000. There is no indication in the record that the father did not remain current with his child support payments during his entire education experience. After law school, Daniel, for a brief time, worked for a law firm and earned $58,000 per year, but subsequently sought and obtained a position as project engineer with H.C.B. Construction earning $45,000. He received more than the project engineer position normally paid because of his law degree. He accepted the job because he thought it would eventually permit him to advance in his field of choice and earn a higher income than he could in law. His student loan payments are $1,270.46 a month.
The trial court refused to consider the student loan obligation when determining the amount of child support increase because the father had voluntarily left his law position and entered the construction field. Because the court failed to find that the father made this change in order to reduce his salary and thus deprive his dependents of income, we find this error. We know of no law that requires one to be employed in a field consistent with his ability which earns the highest income. If so, many fields, perhaps teaching, would go unfilled.
We also find that there was no evidence in the record to support the court's award of attorney's fees to the mother. No one testified concerning attorney's fees except the mother and she merely stated what she paid. There was no evidence as to the reasonableness of the hours or the fees. Boyle v. Boyle, 485 So.2d 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Wiley v. Wiley, 485 So.2d 2 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). We reverse the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Change of Name of Slingsby
...Id. 5. See, e.g., Ostermiller v. Spurr, 968 P.2d 940 (Wyo.1998); Carter v. Reddell, 75 Ark.App. 8, 52 S.W.3d 506 (2001); Daniel v. Moats, 718 So.2d 949 (Fla.App.1998); Montgomery v. Wells, 708 N.W.2d 704 (Iowa App.2005); M.L.M. ex rel. Froggatte v. Millen, 28 Kan. App.2d 392, 15 P.3d 857 (2......
-
Faircloth v. Bliss
...testimony through witnesses other than himself or a stipulation to which his opponent agrees. Id. at 1017; see also Daniel v. Moats, 718 So.2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (holding that evidence did not support award of attorney fees to mother in proceedings to modify fathers child support oblig......
-
Cerra v. Cerra
...her. There is no requirement that a person be employed earning the highest wages available in his or her field. See Daniel v. Moats, 718 So.2d 949, 949-50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Given the trial court's broad discretion in this matter, we find no error in the court's decision not to impute inc......
-
Brewer v. Solovsky
...the testimony from the attorney in support of the fee. Faircloth v. Bliss, 917 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); see also Daniel v. Moats, 718 So.2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Clark v. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, 495 So.2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). In this case, while there was evidence presented ......
-
Alimony and support
...efforts to gain employment equal to the party’s capabilities. [ Pribble v. Pribble, 800 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Daniel v. Moats, 718 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (there is no requirement that person be employed earning highest wages in his or her field); Pickett v. Pickett, 709 So......
-
Attorneys' fees and costs
...FEES. COSTS 17-61 Attorneys’ Fees and Costs §17:196 as to lawyer’s hourly rate and number of hours reasonably expended); Daniel v. Moats, 718 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (no record evidence to support court’s award of fees to wife where wife only one who testified and she merely stated w......
-
Determining the best interest of the child: the resolution of name disputes in paternity actions.
...households. The one reported decision which did not affirm a court's refusal to change a surname is enlightening. In Daniel v. Moats, 718 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), the court addressed a situation in which a child carried the mother's maiden surname even though the mother was now marri......