Daniels v. Area Plan Com'n of Allen County, No. 01-1158.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Manion |
| Citation | 306 F.3d 445 |
| Parties | William DANIELS and Judy Daniels, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ALLEN COUNTY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 01-1158. |
| Decision Date | 11 September 2002 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
64 practice notes
-
Jane Doe v. Va. Dep't of State Police, No. 11–1841.
...[state] procedures for obtaining compensation before bringing a § 1983 action.” Id.; see Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen Cnty., 306 F.3d 445, 453 (7th Cir.2002) (recognizing that “the additional ripeness requirements of Williamson County create a takings claim exception to Patsy 's gen......
-
Elliott v. Bd. of Sch. Trs. of Madison Consol. Sch., No. 16-4168
...tenure before the new statute took effect. We review the district court's decision de novo. Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen County , 306 F.3d 445, 458 (7th Cir. 2002) (reviewing de novo a summary judgment order that declared a state law unconstitutional).At the outset, we note but bypa......
-
Alto Eldorado Partners v. City of Santa Fe, No. CIV 08-0175 JB/ACT.
...facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute under the Fifth Amendment." Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen County, 306 F.3d 445, 458 n. 13 (7th Cir.2002). Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen County relied on what is apparently the first Seventh Circuit case to discuss ripeness......
-
Trustees of Marion Kingdom Hall v. City of Marion, Civil No. 07-530-GPM.
...such remedies are "unavailable or inadequate." 473 U.S. at 197, 105 S.Ct. 3108. See also Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen County, 306 F.3d 445, 456 (7th Cir.2002) (noting "a limited exception" to Williamson County "based on the futility of seeking state court relief"). However, the Cour......
Request a trial to view additional results
64 cases
-
Alto Eldorado Partners v. City of Santa Fe, No. CIV 08-0175 JB/ACT.
...facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute under the Fifth Amendment." Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen County, 306 F.3d 445, 458 n. 13 (7th Cir.2002). Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen County relied on what is apparently the first Seventh Circuit case to discuss ripeness......
-
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. McCurdy, No. 15-0919
...requirement of the Fifth Amendment" of the United States Constitution" (emphasis added));6 Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n of Allen Cty ., 306 F.3d 445, 460 (7th Cir. 2002) (observing that "[e]ven though the Supreme Court has required the existence of a public use to justify a taking, the burde......
-
Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs Local 139 v. Schimel, Case No. 16–CV–590–JPS
...in the context of cases in which injunctive and/or declaratory relief is sought. See, e.g. , Daniels v. Area Plan Com'n of Allen Cnty. , 306 F.3d 445, 449 (7th Cir. 2002) (seeking a declaration under Section 1983 that a certain zoning plan violated the Takings Clause); see also Williamson C......
-
Dyson v. City of Calumet City, No. 16 C 11509
...2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) ; accord Dibble v. Quinn , 793 F.3d 803, 808 (7th Cir. 2015) (due process); Daniels v. Area Plan Comm'n , 306 F.3d 445, 459 (7th Cir. 2002) (takings). Moreover, for an interest to be constitutionally protected, the plaintiff must show she has "a legitimate claim ......
Request a trial to view additional results