Daniels v. City of Arlington Texas, No. 00-11191
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE; WIENER |
| Citation | 246 F.3d 500 |
| Parties | (5th Cir. 2001) GEORGE DANIELS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS; THERON BOWMAN, Chief of Police, Arlington, Texas, Defendants-Appellees. (Summary Calendar) |
| Decision Date | 09 April 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 00-11191 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
534 practice notes
-
Johnson v. State, SC92448.
...were wearing their uniforms as law enforcement officers, an unmistakable symbol of state authority. Daniels v. City of Arlington, 246 F.3d 500, 504 (5th Cir.2001); State v. Jones, 483 So.2d 433, 439 (Fla.1986); Duncan v. State, 163 Ga.App. 148, 294 S.E.2d 365, 366 (1982). Missouri courts ha......
-
Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28, 03-CV-646.
...speech; court notes that the crucifix "is recognized universally as a symbol of Christianity"); but see Daniels v. City of Arlington, 246 F.3d 500 (5th Cir.), cert, denied 534 U.S. 951, 122 S.Ct. 347, 151 L.Ed.2d 262 (2001) (police officer's wearing small crucifix on uniform was not deemed ......
-
Lemmons v. Georgetown University Hosp., Civil Action No. 04-705 (RBW).
...Svcs., 390 F.3d 760, 767 n. 17 (3d. Cir.2004); Jones v. TEK Indus., Inc., 319 F.3d 355, 359 (8th Cir.2003); Daniels v. City of Arlington, 246 F.3d 500, 506 (5th Cir.2001); Chalmers v. Tulon Co. of Richmond, 101 F.3d 1012, 1019 (4th Cir.1996).22 Once a plaintiff successfully establishes a pr......
-
Finnie v. Lee Cnty., : 1:10cv64-A-S
...(emphasis added). More importantly, the Fifth Circuit has applied Smith to a free exercise challenge. See Daniels v. City of Arlington, 246 F.3d 500, 505 (5th Cir. 2001). In Daniels, a city police officer was terminated for insubordination after he refused to stop wearing a gold cross pin o......
Request a trial to view additional results
519 cases
-
Lottinger v. Shell Oil Co., No. CIV. A. H-99-2103.
...the TCHRA is interpreted in a manner consistent with federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. See Daniels v. City of Arlington, 246 F.3d 500, 507 (5th Cir.2001); Grogan, 118 F.Supp.2d at 747; Willrich, 28 S.W.3d at 24; Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranville, 933 S.W.2d 490, 49......
-
Communication Workers v. Ector County Hosp. Dist., No. 03-50230.
...of political buttons, they could not assert that the challenged statutes encompassed such activity. See id. at 610, 93 S.Ct. 2908. 37. 246 F.3d 500 (5th 38. Id. at 504. The Daniels panel had already determined that the speech at issue there — a Christian cross worn on the lapel — was not sp......
-
Gonzalez v. Smith Int'l, Inc., Civil Action No. C–08–311.
...law. SeeFed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). An issue is material if its resolution could affect the outcome of the action. Daniels v. City of Arlington, 246 F.3d 500, 502 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,534 U.S. 951, 122 S.Ct. 347, 151 L.Ed.2d 262 (2001). The Court must examine “whether the evidence presents a su......
-
Willis v. Fugro Chance, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:07-CV-353.
...539, 541 (5th Cir.2003); Harken Exploration Co. v. Sphere Drake Ins. PLC, 261 F.3d 466, 471 (5th Cir.2001); Daniels v. City of Arlington, 246 F.3d 500, 502 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 951, 122 S.Ct. 347, 151 L.Ed.2d 262 (2001). The evidence of the nonmovants is to be believed, with a......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Discrimination based on national origin, religion, and other grounds
...Bruff, 244 F.3d at 500 n.9 (citing Weber v. Roadway Express , 199 F.3d 270, 273 (5th Cir. 2000)); Daniels v. City of Arlington, Tex. , 246 F.3d 500, 506 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 347 (2001); Virts v. Consol. Freightways Corp. , 285 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 2002) (involving male employe......