Danza v. Longieliere
| Decision Date | 16 December 1998 |
| Citation | 681 N.Y.S.2d 603,256 A.D.2d 434 |
| Parties | 1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 11,297 Ippazio DANZA, et al., Appellants, v. Louis E. LONGIELIERE, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Cook, Tucker, Netter & Cloonan, P.C., Kingston (Thomas A. Murphy, of counsel), for appellants.
Boeggeman, George, Hodges & Corde, P.C., White Plains (Robert S. Ondrovic, of counsel), for respondent.
Before ROSENBLATT, J.P., and O'BRIEN, SULLIVAN and KRAUSMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered February 18, 1998, which, after a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, denied their motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, or, in the alternative, to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered March 11, 1998, which dismissed the complaint.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, that branch of the motion which was for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability is granted, the order is modified accordingly, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a trial on the issue of damages; and it is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501[a][1] ).
The plaintiffs seek to recover damages based upon injuries sustained when the vehicle operated by the defendant collided with the vehicle owned by the plaintiff Michele Danza and operated by the plaintiff Ippazio Danza. Immediately prior to the accident, two vehicles traveling in line in front of the plaintiffs' vehicle suddenly stopped when a young boy darted out into the street. The plaintiffs' vehicle, which came to a complete stop five to six feet behind the second vehicle, was stopped for a few seconds before the defendant's vehicle collided with the rear end of the plaintiffs' vehicle. The defendant testified that although he was traveling approximately 20...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bernier v. Torres
...Dept.1994); Power v. Hupart, 260 A.D.2d 458 (2nd Dept. 1999); Caputo v. Schaumeyer, 252 A.D.2d 512 (2nd Dept. 1998); Danza v. Longieliere, 256 A.D.2d 434 (2nd Dept. 1998). The operator of the moving vehicle is required to rebut the inference of negligence created by an unexplained rear-end ......
-
Mouhlas Realty, LLC v Koutelos, 2009 NY Slip Op 30893(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 4/7/2009)
...Power v. Hupart, 260 A.D.2d 458 (2nd Dept. 1999); see, also, Caputo v. Schaumeyer, 252 A.D.2d 512 (2nd Dept. 1998); Danza v. Longieliere, 256 A.D.2d 434 (2nd Dept. 1998). In support of the motion, plaintiff contends that its first and second causes of action for breach of contract and fiduc......
-
Yacoub v. Natt Leasing, Inc.
...v. Gonzalez, 269 A.D.2d 250, 251 [1st Dept 2000] ; Johnson v. Phillips, 261 A.D.2d 269, 271 [1st Dept 1999] ; Danza v. Longieliere, 256 A.D.2d 434, 435 [2nd Dept 1998] ). In order to rebut the presumption of negligence, the operator of the rear-ending vehicle is required provide a cognizabl......
-
Colletti v. Periera, 2008 NY Slip Op 30369(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1/31/2008)
...Power v. Hupart, 260 A.D.2d 458 (2nd Dept. 1999); see, also, Caputo v. Schaumeyer, 252 A.D.2d 512 (2nd Dept. 1998); Danza v. Longieliere, 256 A.D.2d 434 (2nd Dept. 1998). In short, the driver of the offending vehicle is required to rebut the inference of negligence, and if he or she cannot ......