Dark Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Association v. Robertson
Decision Date | 06 January 1926 |
Docket Number | 12,214 |
Citation | 150 N.E. 106,84 Ind.App. 51 |
Parties | DARK TOBACCO GROWERS' CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION v. ROBERTSON |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
From Warrick Circuit Court; Caleb J. Lindsey, Judge.
Action by the Dark Tobacco Growers' Association against Baxter T. Robertson. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.
Reversed.
Elbert M. Swan and Roy G. Garrison, for appellant.
Roscoe Kiper, for appellee.
Complaint by appellant against appellee, one of its members, for the recovery of liquidated damages for breach of a marketing agreement signed by appellee. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained; hence this appeal.
The complaint alleges: That appellant is a nonprofit corporation without capital stock, organized November 20, 1922, under the provisions of the act of the General Assembly of the State of Kentucky approved January 10, 1922, and known as, "The Bingham Co-operative Marketing Act." That in February 1923, it filed a certified copy of its articles of incorporation in the office of the secretary of state of Indiana and made application for authority to do business in this state in accordance with the provisions of, "An act to regulate the admission of foreign corporations not for profit to do business in the State of Indiana," approved March 1, 1921, and that the secretary of state granted and issued to it license and authority to do, transact, and engage in business in this state in accordance with the objects and purposes of its articles of incorporation, and that it has been "doing business" in this state since that time. That appellee became and was a member of appellant corporation by virtue of his agreement and the acceptance thereof by appellant. That appellee by this written agreement, a copy of which is made a part of the complaint, sold to appellant all tobacco raised by him in 1923, and certain other years, and agreed to deliver the same to appellant. That said contract was signed by appellee in this state and thereafter submitted to and accepted by appellant in the State of Kentucky, and by its terms was subject to interpretation and enforcement according to the laws of Kentucky, the consideration of said agreement being the mutual promises of the parties thereto as set out in such agreement. That appellee raised 5,000 pounds of tobacco in 1923, but failed to deliver the same or any part thereof to appellant, but had sold and delivered the same to other parties in violation of his said agreement.
A copy of "The Bingham Co-operative Market Act" of Kentucky was copied in and made a part of the complaint. This act authorized the incorporation of a nonprofit co-operative association with or without capital stock "to engage in any activity in connection with the marketing or selling of the agricultural products of its members, or with the harvesting, preserving, drying, processing, canning, packing, grading, storing, handling, shipping, or utilization thereof, or the manufacturing or marketing of the by-products thereof; or in connection with the manufacturing, selling, or supplying to its members of machinery, equipment or supplies; or in the financing of the above activities; or any one or more of the activities specified herein."
An association organized under that act was given the power to engage: (a) In any of the activities above named; (b) to borrow money without limitation as to the amount and make advances to members; (c) to act as agent for any member in any of said activities; (d) to acquire, hold, sell, pledge, or guarantee payment of dividends or interest on, or the retirement of shares of capital stock or bonds of any corporation engaged in any related activity, or in the warehousing, handling or marketing of any product handled by the association; (e) to establish reserves and invest same; (f) to buy and hold personal and real property necessary for conducting the business of the association; and (g) to do each and everything necessary, suitable, or proper to accomplish any one of the purposes or attainments named, or expedient for the interest of the association and to contract accordingly.
Section 17 of the act authorized the association and its members to make and execute marketing contracts requiring the members to sell, for any period of time, not to exceed ten years, all or any part of their agricultural products and that such contract should pass title of the products to the association. Section 18 provided that the by-laws or marketing contract might fix as liquidated damages specific sums to be paid by the member to the association upon a breach by him of his marketing contract.
The material provisions of the marketing agreement which is the foundation of this action read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dark Tobacco Growers' Co-Op. Ass'n v. Robertson
... ... Jan. 6, 1926 ... In Banc. Appeal from Warrick Circuit Court; Caleb J. Lindsey, Judge. Action by the Dark Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Association against Baxter T. Robertson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed with directions. [150 N.E. 107] Elbert M. Swan, of ... ...
- Ft. Wayne Corrugated Paper Co. v. Tobey
- Ft. Wayne Corrugated Paper Company v. Tobey