Darnell v. Moorestown Tp.
Court | New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division |
Citation | 400 A.2d 492,167 N.J.Super. 16 |
Decision Date | 16 March 1979 |
Parties | Emerson L. DARNELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN, Respondent, and Director, Division of Taxation, Intervenor-Respondent. |
Page 16
v.
TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN, Respondent,
and
Director, Division of Taxation, Intervenor-Respondent.
Decided March 16, 1979.
[400 A.2d 493]
Page 17
Emerson Darnell, pro se.John J. Degnan, Atty. Gen., for respondent Director, Div. of Taxation (Erminie L. Conley, Asst. Atty. Gen. of counsel; Harry Haushalter, Deputy Atty. Gen., on the brief).
Respondent Tp. of Moorestown did not file brief.
Before Judges LORA, MICHELS and LARNER.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
LORA, P. J. A. D.
Petitioner, a conscientious objector during World War II, was assigned by the Selective Service System to "work of national importance" under civilian direction in lieu of military service from 1941 to 1945. His application for the 1972 tax year for the $50 annual veterans' deduction granted under N.J.S.A. 54:4-8.10 of the Local Property Tax Law for his home at 204 Eastbourne Terrace, Moorestown, was denied by the tax assessor of the Township of Moorestown and said denial was affirmed by the Burlington County Board of Taxation. Thereafter, the State Division of Tax Appeals determined that the appellant was in civilian service during the war, was not a veteran as
Page 18
defined by N.J.S.A. 54:4-8.10(h) and hence did not qualify for the exemption.On appeal, petitioner contends that the denial of such deduction to World War II civilian draftees who performed alternative service, imposes an annual, discriminatory penalty of cumulative economic impact for past "witness" to religious beliefs, in violation of N.J.Const. (1947), Art. I, par. 5, and penalizes them annually for their past exercise of their religious beliefs contrary to N.J.Const. (1947), Art. I, par. 3, and in violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution which is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Appellant's alternative service duty included working as a fire tower operator, a forest fire fighter, a timber cruiser, a hookworm eradicator and taking part in a liferaft rations experiment.
N.J.Const. (1947), Art. VIII, § 1, par. 3, provides in pertinent part that
Any citizen and resident of this State now or hereafter honorably discharged or released under honorable circumstances from active service, in time of war or of other emergency as, from time to time, defined by the Legislature, in any branch of the Armed Forces of the United States shall be entitled, annually, to a deduction from the amount of any tax bill for taxes on real and personal property, or both, in the sum of $50.00 or if the amount of any such tax bill shall be less than $50.00, to a cancellation thereof, which deduction or cancellation shall not be altered or repealed.
The intent of the framers of this provision was to mandate statutory property tax relief to compensate veterans for the experiences of war and to encourage veterans to purchase property in this State. The minutes of the proceedings give no indication that the drafters of the provision intended to include conscientious objectors who served in civilian service during the war. 5 Proceedings of the New Jersey Constitutional Convention of 1947, Proceedings before Committee on Taxation and Finance, July 10, 1947, at 666 to 672.
Page 19
The veterans' deduction, authorized and mandated by the aforesaid Article of the New Jersey Constitution, is implemented by N.J.S.A. 54:4-8.11:
Every person a citizen and resident of this State now or hereafter honorably discharged or released under honorable circumstances from active service in time of war in any branch of the Armed Forces of the United States and a widow [400 A.2d 494] as defined herein, during her widowhood and while a resident of this State, shall be entitled, annually, on proper claim being made therefor, to a deduction from the amount of any tax bill for taxes on real or personal property or both in the sum of $50.00 or if the amount of any such tax shall be less than $50.00, to a cancellation thereof.
The term "veteran" is defined as:
* * *...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bentz v. Twp. of Little Egg Harbor, DOCKET NO. A-5878-17T1
...reason that "veterans' preference laws do not involve a suspect class." Id. at 547-48 (quoting Page 6Darnell v. Twp. of Moorestown, 167 N.J. Super. 16, 21 (App. Div. 1979)). As the judge explained:"[T]he Equal Protection Clause does not require that all persons be treated alike." As long as......
-
Borough of Wrightstown v. Medved
...veterans for the experiences of war and to encourage veterans to purchase property in the State." Darnell v. Township of Moorestown, 167 N.J.Super. 16, 18, 400 A.2d 492 (App.Div.1979), certif. den. 81 N.J. 292, 405 A.2d 836 (1979). Knowing that his widow will receive the exemption provides ......
-
SR v. Twp. of Waterford, Docket No. 000668-2017
...for the experiences of war and to encourage veterans to purchase property in this State." Ibid. (quoting Darnell v. Moorestown, 167 N.J. Super. 16, 18 (App. Div. 1979), certif. denied, 81 N.J. 292 (1979) (citing, 5 Proceedings of the New Jersey Constitutional Convention of 1947, Proceedings......
-
Bentz v. Twp. of Little Egg Harbor, DOCKET NO. 009763-2017
...at risk for our nation, merit some economic recognition for their valuable contribution. As stated in Darnell v. Twp. of Moorestown, 167 N.J. Super. 16, 18 (App. Div. 1979), "[t]he intent of the framers of [the] . . . [exemption] provision [in our Constitution] was to mandate statutory prop......
-
Bentz v. Twp. of Little Egg Harbor, DOCKET NO. A-5878-17T1
...reason that "veterans' preference laws do not involve a suspect class." Id. at 547-48 (quoting Page 6Darnell v. Twp. of Moorestown, 167 N.J. Super. 16, 21 (App. Div. 1979)). As the judge explained:"[T]he Equal Protection Clause does not require that all persons be treated alike." As long as......
-
Borough of Wrightstown v. Medved
...veterans for the experiences of war and to encourage veterans to purchase property in the State." Darnell v. Township of Moorestown, 167 N.J.Super. 16, 18, 400 A.2d 492 (App.Div.1979), certif. den. 81 N.J. 292, 405 A.2d 836 (1979). Knowing that his widow will receive the exemption provides ......
-
SR v. Twp. of Waterford, Docket No. 000668-2017
...for the experiences of war and to encourage veterans to purchase property in this State." Ibid. (quoting Darnell v. Moorestown, 167 N.J. Super. 16, 18 (App. Div. 1979), certif. denied, 81 N.J. 292 (1979) (citing, 5 Proceedings of the New Jersey Constitutional Convention of 1947, Proceedings......
-
Bentz v. Twp. of Little Egg Harbor, DOCKET NO. 009763-2017
...at risk for our nation, merit some economic recognition for their valuable contribution. As stated in Darnell v. Twp. of Moorestown, 167 N.J. Super. 16, 18 (App. Div. 1979), "[t]he intent of the framers of [the] . . . [exemption] provision [in our Constitution] was to mandate statutory prop......