Dassigienis v. Cosmos Carriers & Trading Corp., 612

Decision Date05 May 1971
Docket NumberNo. 612,Docket 35023.,612
Citation442 F.2d 1016
PartiesGeorge DASSIGIENIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COSMOS CARRIERS & TRADING CORP. et al., Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Francis E. Dorn, Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff-appellant.

Alvin L. Stern, New York City (Poles, Tublin, Patestides & Stratakis, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before SMITH and MOORE, Circuit Judges and TIMBERS,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff brought this action for maintenance and cure based on injuries arising out of his employment on the vessel M. T. Sophia M. He appeals from the dismissal of his action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.

The facts are stipulated. Plaintiff, a Greek seaman, signed onto the vessel in Antwerp, Belgium pursuant to Greek articles. He was injured in international waters. The Sophia M. was chartered by Chevron Transport Corporation and when pursuant to the terms of that charter, the vessel made its first call at a port in the continental United States, at Perth Amboy, New Jersey, in the Port of New York, the plaintiff signed off the vessel. Subsequent thereto, several doctors treated the plaintiff in the State of New York. One of these doctors acted on behalf of the Sophia M.'s owners, the defendant, Ionian Shipping Co.

The Sophia M. is registered in the Republic of Panama, and Ionian is a corporation organized under the laws of Liberia. None of the stock of Ionian is owned by any citizen of the United States, and it does not maintain a place of business in the United States, although it does maintain a checking account in a New York bank. The defendant Cosmos Carriers and Trading Corporation, a Delaware Corporation owned by United States interests with a place of business in New York, acted as Ionian's agent when the Sophia M. was in New York. The defendant Cosmos International Shipping, Inc., is a Panamanian Corporation, none of whose stock is owned by United States citizens. It acts as Ionian's Panamanian agent. The plaintiff was never employed by either Cosmos Carriers or Cosmos International.

We hold that the District Court properly dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

As against the defendant Cosmos Carriers and Cosmos International, no claim against them is proper either under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688) or under a claim for maintenance and cure to be brought on the law side of the civil docket under the Court's diversity jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332), since neither of these defendants acted as plaintiff's employer. See Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783, 789, 69 S.Ct. 1317, 93 L.Ed. 1692 (1949).

As against Ionian, whether the Jones Act provides jurisdiction should be determined by reference to Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571, 73 S.Ct. 921, 97 L.Ed. 1254 (1953). If the Jones Act provides jurisdiction in the federal courts to hear a particular action, its substantive provisions will be applied. Accordingly, the test of subject matter jurisdiction involves an analysis of various connecting factors which might justify the application of United States law to a particular claim. Six of the factors clearly involve no connection with the United States under the facts of this case: place of the wrongful act, law of the flag, allegiance of the injured seaman, allegiance of the owner1 and place of the contract. Since Ionian...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Japan Petroleum Co.(Nigeria) Ltd. v. Ashland Oil
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Delaware
    • 11 Agosto 1978
    ...if the action is dismissed for nonjoinder. 6 There is no diversity in a suit between two aliens. See, Dassigienis v. Cosmos Carriers & Trading Corp., 442 F.2d 1016 (2d Cir. 1971). When an alien sues a citizen of a state and another alien, the rule of complete diversity divests a court of ju......
  • De Wit v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, NV
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 7 Septiembre 1983
    ...F.2d 1001, 1015 (2d Cir.1975); Joseph Muller Corp. Zurich v. Societe Anonyme de Gerance, supra, at 729; Dassigienis v. Cosmos Carriers & Trading Corp., 442 F.2d 1016, 1017 (2d Cir.1971). Thus, because he is a foreign citizen and KLM a foreign corporation, de Wit cannot successfully assert a......
  • WJ Holding Ltd. v. Shireen Mar. Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 25 Noviembre 2020
    ...See, e.g., Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354, 381 (1959) (dictum); Dassigienis v. Cosmos Carriers & Trading Corp., 442 F.2d 1016, 1017 (2d Cir. 1971) (per curiam); see also Universal Licensing Corp. v. Paola del Lungo S.p.A., 293 F.3d 579, 581 (2d Cir. 2002) (hold......
  • Mattes v. National Hellenic Am. Line, SA
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 24 Enero 1977
    ...354, 358, 380, 79 S.Ct. 468, 3 L.Ed.2d 368; Montalet v. Murray, 4 Cranch (8 U.S.) 46, 2 L.Ed. 545 (1807); Dassigienis v. Cosmos Carriers & Trading Corp., 442 F.2d 1016 (2d Cir. 1971), aff'g 321 F.Supp. 1253 (S.D.N.Y. 1970). However, where general maritime claims arise out of the same transa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT