Daunt v. Benson
Decision Date | 15 April 2020 |
Docket Number | 19-2420,Nos. 19-2377,s. 19-2377 |
Citation | 956 F.3d 396 |
Parties | Anthony DAUNT, Tom Barrett, Aaron Beauchine, Kathy Berden, Stephen Daunt, Gerry Hildenbrand, Gary Koutsoubos, Linda Lee Tarver, Patrick Meyers, Marian Sheridan, Mary Shinkle, Norm Shinkle, Paul Sheridan, Bridget Beard, and Clint Tarver ; Michigan Republican Party, Laura Cox, Terri Lynn Land, Savina Alexandra Zoe Mucci, Dorian Thompson, and Hank Vaupel , Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jocelyn BENSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State; Count MI Vote, doing business as Voters Not Politicians, Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
These two appeals arise from challenges filed by individual plaintiffs and the Michigan Republican Party to Michigan's new Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission. The Commission was established by ballot initiative in the 2018 Michigan general election. The first lawsuit was filed by Michigan citizens who allege that they are unconstitutionally excluded from serving on the Commission due to its eligibility criteria, which prohibit eight classes of individuals with certain current or past political ties from serving as a commissioner. The second lawsuit was filed by the Michigan Republican Party and individual plaintiffs, making the same allegation as the first lawsuit and raising other First Amendment allegations regarding the Commission's selection process, its composition, and its restrictions on the commissioners' ability to speak publicly about redistricting matters.
The plaintiffs in both cases moved for preliminary injunctions against the implementation of the Commission. The district court denied these motions, and the plaintiffs have appealed. For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
On November 6, 2018, Michigan voters voted in favor of Proposal 18-2 on the general election ballot. MICH. CONST. , art. IV, § 6. Proposal 18-2 stated the following:
This proposed constitutional amendment would:
Michigan Board of State Canvassers, Official Ballot Wording approved by the Board of State Canvassers, August 30, 2018, Voters Not Politicians , https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/Official_Ballot_Wording_Prop_18-2_632052_7.pdf. This constitutional amendment (the "Amendment") took effect on December 22, 2018. MICH. CONST. , art. IV, § 6.
Article IV, § 6 of the amended Michigan Constitution sets forth the eligibility criteria for membership on the newly created "independent citizens redistricting commission" (the "Commission"), as follows:
Section 2 of article IV sets forth the process by which the Secretary of State selects commissioners, as follows:
Id. Commissioners hold office until the Commission has completed its obligations for the census cycle. Id. § 18. They receive compensation equal to at least 25 percent of the governor's salary, and the State reimburses them for costs incurred if the legislature does not appropriate sufficient funds to cover these costs. Id. § 5.
With respect to the Commission's operations, "[a] final decision of the commission to adopt a redistricting plan requires a majority vote of the commission, including at least two commissioners who affiliate with each major p...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R.K. v. Lee
...as here, the defendant is the government, the third and fourth factors merge. Nken, 556 U.S. at 434, 129 S.Ct. 1749 ; Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 422 (6th Cir. 2020)."These factors are not prerequisites, but are factors that are to be balanced against each other." Memphis A. Philip Rando......
-
Mazo v. New Jersey Secretary of State
...requirement for non-major parties); Norman , 502 U.S. at 279, 112 S.Ct. 698 (same, for greater signature requirement); Daunt v. Benson , 956 F.3d 396, 402 (6th Cir. 2020) (concluding no severe burden where Michigan law required certain composition of members on redistricting commission base......
-
Thomas v. Stevens
...Court will deny Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and motion for a preliminary injunction as moot. See Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 421-22 (6th Cir. 2020) (“[A] court must not issue a preliminary injunction where the movant presents no likelihood of merits success.”). B......
-
Memphis A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Hargett
...and instead leaves federal judges to weigh standards entirely crafted by the judges themselves. Daunt v. Benson (Daunt I) , 956 F.3d 396, 424 (6th Cir. 2020) (Readler, J., concurring) ("In sensitive policy-oriented cases, [ Anderson - Burdick ] affords far too much discretion to judges in r......
-
Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law
...(first quoting Norman v. Reed, 502 U.S. 279, 289 (1992); and then quoting Anderson , 460 U.S. at 788)). 80. Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 406–07 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted, 834 F.3d 620, 627 (6th Cir. 2016)). 81. Crawford v. Marion Cnty. Election Bd., 553 U.S......
-
Restoring the Proper Role of the Courts in Election Law: Toward a Reinvigoration of the Political Question Doctrine
...right to vote by absentee ballot,” but that states can statutorily provide this right, and all have chosen to do so). 76. Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 423 (6th Cir. 2020) (Readler, J., concurring). Indeed, the slope to expand Anderson-Burdick to myriad other public law contexts having onl......
-
TOWARD FAIRER REPRESENTATION IN STATE LEGISLATURES.
...Initiative (2018), BALLOTPEDIA, https://perma.cc/GM2T-4WT5, amending MICH. CONST. arts. IV, V, and VI. (252.) See, e.g., Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396 (6th Cir. 2020) (denying preliminary injunction to plaintiffs who challenged the constitutionality of the commission's creation and (253.) S......
-
TOWARD FAIRER REPRESENTATION IN STATE LEGISLATURES.
...Initiative (2018), BALLOTPEDIA, https://perma.cc/GM2T-4WT5, amending MICH. CONST. arts. IV, V, and VI. (252.) See, e.g., Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396 (6th Cir. 2020) (denying preliminary injunction to plaintiffs who challenged the constitutionality of the commission's creation and (253.) S......