Daunt v. Benson

Decision Date15 April 2020
Docket Number19-2420,Nos. 19-2377,s. 19-2377
Citation956 F.3d 396
Parties Anthony DAUNT, Tom Barrett, Aaron Beauchine, Kathy Berden, Stephen Daunt, Gerry Hildenbrand, Gary Koutsoubos, Linda Lee Tarver, Patrick Meyers, Marian Sheridan, Mary Shinkle, Norm Shinkle, Paul Sheridan, Bridget Beard, and Clint Tarver ; Michigan Republican Party, Laura Cox, Terri Lynn Land, Savina Alexandra Zoe Mucci, Dorian Thompson, and Hank Vaupel , Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jocelyn BENSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State; Count MI Vote, doing business as Voters Not Politicians, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge

These two appeals arise from challenges filed by individual plaintiffs and the Michigan Republican Party to Michigan's new Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission. The Commission was established by ballot initiative in the 2018 Michigan general election. The first lawsuit was filed by Michigan citizens who allege that they are unconstitutionally excluded from serving on the Commission due to its eligibility criteria, which prohibit eight classes of individuals with certain current or past political ties from serving as a commissioner. The second lawsuit was filed by the Michigan Republican Party and individual plaintiffs, making the same allegation as the first lawsuit and raising other First Amendment allegations regarding the Commission's selection process, its composition, and its restrictions on the commissioners' ability to speak publicly about redistricting matters.

The plaintiffs in both cases moved for preliminary injunctions against the implementation of the Commission. The district court denied these motions, and the plaintiffs have appealed. For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND
A. Establishment of the Commission

On November 6, 2018, Michigan voters voted in favor of Proposal 18-2 on the general election ballot. MICH. CONST. , art. IV, § 6. Proposal 18-2 stated the following:

Proposal 18-2
A proposed constitutional amendment to establish a commission of citizens with exclusive authority to adopt district boundaries for the Michigan Senate, Michigan House of Representatives and U.S. Congress, every 10 years.

This proposed constitutional amendment would:

• Create a commission of 13 registered voters randomly selected by the Secretary of State:
? 4 each who self-identify as affiliated with the 2 major political parties; and
? 5 who self-identify as unaffiliated with major political parties.
• Prohibit partisan officeholders and candidates, their employees, certain relatives, and lobbyists from serving as commissioners.
• Establish new redistricting criteria including geographically compact and contiguous districts of equal population, reflecting Michigan's diverse population and communities of interest. Districts shall not provide disproportionate advantage to political parties or candidates.
• Require an appropriation of funds for commission operations and commissioner compensation.
Should this proposal be adopted?
[ ] YES
[ ] NO

Michigan Board of State Canvassers, Official Ballot Wording approved by the Board of State Canvassers, August 30, 2018, Voters Not Politicians , https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/Official_Ballot_Wording_Prop_18-2_632052_7.pdf. This constitutional amendment (the "Amendment") took effect on December 22, 2018. MICH. CONST. , art. IV, § 6.

B. Structure of the Commission

Article IV, § 6 of the amended Michigan Constitution sets forth the eligibility criteria for membership on the newly created "independent citizens redistricting commission" (the "Commission"), as follows:

(1) An independent citizens redistricting commission for state legislative and congressional districts (hereinafter, the "commission") is hereby established as a permanent commission in the legislative branch. The commission shall consist of 13 commissioners. The commission shall adopt a redistricting plan for each of the following types of districts: state senate districts, state house of representative districts, and congressional districts. Each commissioner shall:
(a) Be registered and eligible to vote in the state of Michigan;
(b) Not currently be or in the past 6 years have been any of the following:
(i) A declared candidate for partisan federal, state, or local office;
(ii) An elected official to partisan federal, state, or local office;
(iii) An officer or member of the governing body of a national, state, or local political party;
(iv) A paid consultant or employee of a federal, state, or local elected official or political candidate, of a federal, state, or local political candidate's campaign, or of a political action committee;
(v) An employee of the legislature;
(vi) Any person who is registered as a lobbyist agent with the Michigan bureau of elections, or any employee of such person; or
(vii) An unclassified state employee who is exempt from classification in state civil service pursuant to article XI, section 5, except for employees of courts of record, employees of the state institutions of higher education, and persons in the armed forces of the state;
(c) Not be a parent, stepparent, child, stepchild, or spouse of any individual disqualified under part (1)(b) of this section; or
(d) Not be otherwise disqualified for appointed or elected office by this constitution.
(e) For five years after the date of appointment, a commissioner is ineligible to hold a partisan elective office at the state, county, city, village, or township level in Michigan.

Id.

Section 2 of article IV sets forth the process by which the Secretary of State selects commissioners, as follows:

(a) The secretary of state shall do all of the following:
(i) Make applications for commissioner available to the general public not later than January 1 of the year of the federal decennial census. The secretary of state shall circulate the applications in a manner that invites wide public participation from different regions of the state. The secretary of state shall also mail applications for commissioner to ten thousand Michigan registered voters, selected at random, by January 1 of the year of the federal decennial census.
(ii) Require applicants to provide a completed application.
(iii) Require applicants to attest under oath that they meet the qualifications set forth in this section; and either that they affiliate with one of the two political parties with the largest representation in the legislature (hereinafter, "major parties"), and if so, identify the party with which they affiliate, or that they do not affiliate with either of the major parties.
(b) Subject to part (2)(c) of this section, the secretary of state shall mail additional applications for commissioner to Michigan registered voters selected at random until 30 qualifying applicants that affiliate with one of the two major parties have submitted applications, 30 qualifying applicants that identify that they affiliate with the other of the two major parties have submitted applications, and 40 qualifying applicants that identify that they do not affiliate with either of the two major parties have submitted applications, each in response to the mailings.
(c) The secretary of state shall accept applications for commissioner until June 1 of the year of the federal decennial census.
(d) By July 1 of the year of the federal decennial census, from all of the applications submitted, the secretary of state shall:
(i) Eliminate incomplete applications and applications of applicants who do not meet the qualifications in parts (1)(a) through (1)(d) of this section based solely on the information contained in the applications;
(ii) Randomly select 60 applicants from each pool of affiliating applicants and 80 applicants from the pool of non-affiliating applicants. 50% of each pool shall be populated from the qualifying applicants to such pool who returned an application mailed pursuant to part 2(a) or 2(b) of this section, provided, that if fewer than 30 qualifying applicants affiliated with a major party or fewer than 40 qualifying non-affiliating applicants have applied to serve on the commission in response to the random mailing, the balance of the pool shall be populated from the balance of qualifying applicants to that pool. The random selection process used by the secretary of state to fill the selection pools shall use accepted statistical weighting methods to ensure that the pools, as closely as possible, mirror the geographic and demographic makeup of the state; and
(iii) Submit the randomly-selected applications to the majority leader and the minority leader of the senate, and the speaker of the house of representatives and the minority leader of the house of representatives.
(e) By August 1 of the year of the federal decennial census, the majority leader of the senate, the minority leader of the senate, the speaker of the house of representatives, and the minority leader of the house of representatives may each strike five applicants from any pool or pools, up to a maximum of 20 total strikes by the four legislative leaders.
(f) By September 1 of the year of the federal decennial census, the secretary of state shall randomly draw the names of four commissioners from each of the two pools of remaining applicants affiliating with a major party, and five commissioners from the pool of remaining non-affiliating applicants.

Id. Commissioners hold office until the Commission has completed its obligations for the census cycle. Id. § 18. They receive compensation equal to at least 25 percent of the governor's salary, and the State reimburses them for costs incurred if the legislature does not appropriate sufficient funds to cover these costs. Id. § 5.

With respect to the Commission's operations, "[a] final decision of the commission to adopt a redistricting plan requires a majority vote of the commission, including at least two commissioners who affiliate with each major p...

To continue reading

Request your trial
66 cases
  • R.K. v. Lee
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • December 10, 2021
    ...as here, the defendant is the government, the third and fourth factors merge. Nken, 556 U.S. at 434, 129 S.Ct. 1749 ; Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 422 (6th Cir. 2020)."These factors are not prerequisites, but are factors that are to be balanced against each other." Memphis A. Philip Rando......
  • Mazo v. New Jersey Secretary of State
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • November 23, 2022
    ...requirement for non-major parties); Norman , 502 U.S. at 279, 112 S.Ct. 698 (same, for greater signature requirement); Daunt v. Benson , 956 F.3d 396, 402 (6th Cir. 2020) (concluding no severe burden where Michigan law required certain composition of members on redistricting commission base......
  • Thomas v. Stevens
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • August 16, 2022
    ...Court will deny Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and motion for a preliminary injunction as moot. See Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 421-22 (6th Cir. 2020) (“[A] court must not issue a preliminary injunction where the movant presents no likelihood of merits success.”). B......
  • Memphis A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Hargett
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • June 22, 2021
    ...and instead leaves federal judges to weigh standards entirely crafted by the judges themselves. Daunt v. Benson (Daunt I) , 956 F.3d 396, 424 (6th Cir. 2020) (Readler, J., concurring) ("In sensitive policy-oriented cases, [ Anderson - Burdick ] affords far too much discretion to judges in r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Election Law as Ideology: Toward a New Historiography of Democracy as a Function of Law
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 111-3, March 2023
    • March 1, 2023
    ...(f‌irst quoting Norman v. Reed, 502 U.S. 279, 289 (1992); and then quoting Anderson , 460 U.S. at 788)). 80. Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 406–07 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted, 834 F.3d 620, 627 (6th Cir. 2016)). 81. Crawford v. Marion Cnty. Election Bd., 553 U.S......
  • Restoring the Proper Role of the Courts in Election Law: Toward a Reinvigoration of the Political Question Doctrine
    • United States
    • The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy No. 20-2, April 2022
    • April 1, 2022
    ...right to vote by absentee ballot,” but that states can statutorily provide this right, and all have chosen to do so). 76. Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396, 423 (6th Cir. 2020) (Readler, J., concurring). Indeed, the slope to expand Anderson-Burdick to myriad other public law contexts having onl......
  • TOWARD FAIRER REPRESENTATION IN STATE LEGISLATURES.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law & Policy Review Vol. 33 No. 1, March 2022
    • March 1, 2022
    ...Initiative (2018), BALLOTPEDIA, https://perma.cc/GM2T-4WT5, amending MICH. CONST. arts. IV, V, and VI. (252.) See, e.g., Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396 (6th Cir. 2020) (denying preliminary injunction to plaintiffs who challenged the constitutionality of the commission's creation and (253.) S......
  • TOWARD FAIRER REPRESENTATION IN STATE LEGISLATURES.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law & Policy Review Vol. 33 No. 2, June 2022
    • June 22, 2022
    ...Initiative (2018), BALLOTPEDIA, https://perma.cc/GM2T-4WT5, amending MICH. CONST. arts. IV, V, and VI. (252.) See, e.g., Daunt v. Benson, 956 F.3d 396 (6th Cir. 2020) (denying preliminary injunction to plaintiffs who challenged the constitutionality of the commission's creation and (253.) S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT